BLOGDIAL : We are the best

It makes you seem like you've watched too many James Bond films.

I said "These Scientists" not "All Scientists" I am clearly talking about only those scientists who are evil. English is the language of science; with it, you can be very precise, unfortunately, its ultimately up to the reader to read properly.

I've said before, scientists come from a cross-section of society as much as any profession and there are likely to be good, bad, misguided and stupid scientists as much as there are computer programmers or milkmen.

Yes, we read this. What we need to hear is a total condemnation of these evil bastards, from a group of responsible scientists. IS there such a group? Hmmmmm.

"Would a musician be enraged if I sat demanding the extraplanetary departure of all musicians because some shithead had the audacity to push Britney Spears into my ears?"

That is a Low Quality Argument® Try harder!

Would you miss your car if they were all blown up cos some geezer decided to smash into a crowd?

And another LQA®

Yeah....responsibility is another thing. But anything can be labelled offensive or dangerous (guns anyone?) and censorship is a dark and dangerous realm populated by vigilantes...

Weapons of mass destruction, which include biological weapons are not the same as Britney Spears, the Car Problem or the prohibition of gun carrying. Be serious.

No one is saying that someone cant write a scientific paper. What we are saying is that if scientists cannot find it within thier souless bodies to behave in a responsible manner, that the will have to be stopped, before they inadvertantly cause a catastrophe.

Nuclear capability changed everyones lives.

Nuclear scientists, at least the bomb makers, are starting to behave responsibly. They are simulating thier bombs instead of exploding them to test them, with computers like the ASCII White.

Breeding (esp selective breeding) changes what life is.

Selective breeding has built in natural barriers that stops certain types of thing happening. You cannot put a pig gene in a human with selective breeding. Selective breeding is natural, slow moving and not a trans species activity. There is no comparison between selective breeding and the "not available in nature", trans species hybridization that scientists are now carrying out.

It frightens everyone that biologists cannot make this distinction, and is the cause of the slur that they think that they are God. They are comparing thier work to the breeding and selection processes that occoured before man was even here.

GPS: find your way through Yosemite, or guide a bomb to its target. Molecular medicine: identify the gene for deafness, alzheimers, Cystic fibrosis.... or open up the potential for biological weapons. Nuclear physics: understand how the universe functions or make fission bombs. Computers: the internet or terrorist training and communication tool.

In some of these cases, a scientist is the enabler. The choice to work on evil is theirs and theirs alone. They cannot pass the buck. The buck stops with them. After the printing press or the telephone or the internet is created, how the public uses it is a matter for everyones individual concience. Each of the latter cannot, through the acttions of one person destroy all life on earth. They are fundamentally different from the irresponsible biologist.

Anyway, the point is there are always opposing views in any argument, but they should be rational and fact-based, without the kind of language that The Sun would find inflammatory.

Inflamatory language is appropriate because the sons of bitches are not listening. They get on thier high horses, say bend over and take the shot, because you know nothing and we know everything. That behaviour is the cause of inflamatory language. The total disregard for everything other than thier work is the cause for inflammatory language. And if you think that this is inflammatory, you should read the works of the anti vivisectionists, who go out and "solve the problem" after some inflamatory writing.

Members of parliament, after using inflamatory language, go out and "solve the problem" by violently tearing up the contaminating crops being planted all over the country.

Akin, you defended the development of nuclear weapons because "When pushed to war, when everything is at stake, all bets are off".

I dont defend it, I made a statement of fact. Let me say it a different way: When you initiate a war, any and all means will be used against you to destroy you.

Will you now defend these evil vermin virologists because Dubya has declared a war on terrorism?

Firstly, the war on Terrorism is not a true war. Everyone knows this, so that is a LQA.

War is no more an excuse than anything else. The US didn't push for the A-bomb to end the war, they did it to get the upper hand in all negotiations following the war. The bombings on Japan were unnecessary.

So they say...today. Did you know that after the first bobm (yes, bobm) was dropped, the Japanese government refused to surrender? Its a fascinating story, however its off topic.

Jeez...

Slip of the tounge? :]

These people are state funded. They have to say what they're going to do before they get the money. They have to report every year. For the govt to say 'hey, we didn't know they were doing that!' is plain bollocks. Spin spin spin. Don't believe the hype.

Once again, scientists make the proposals, scientists do the work, they are guilty. Period. If and when these weapons are released, and their side looses, they will be hung for crimes against humanity as the creators of these pathogens. No amount of pleading that "the government paid for the work" will save them from the noose.

Pictures from the radio

The Moral Minority

Switch on for state snooping

Vitacost.com Acquires DrKoop.com

Scientists call for vaccination strategy