![\"The](\"http:\/\/www.kledzik.strony.pl\/zdjecia\/images\/8016_1.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Wac?aw Kledzik\u2019s (8.0.1.6) \u2018Arbeitskarte\u2019 (work permit), produced for Ignacy Szczygie?, a Pole from eastern borderland.<\/p>\n
http:\/\/www.kledzik.strony.pl<\/a><\/p>\n http:\/\/sorrel.humboldt.edu\/<\/a><\/p>\n http:\/\/wwii-militaria.net\/civilian_documents.htm <\/a><\/p>\n http:\/\/www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk\/id.htm<\/a><\/p>\n POW ID card at Stalag Luft I<\/strong><\/font><\/p>\n www.merkki.com\/potterlc.htm<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n And this is the BEST collection:<\/p>\n http:\/\/www.usmbooks.com\/index_rare_documents.html<\/a><\/p>\n and now, for a blog article…<\/p>\n ID cards part of the World ID project<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n The ID cards coming into forced usage in the United Kingdom are part of a global project called the World ID project.<\/span> Its hard to imagine the contrast, when in Asia <\/span>1 billion live in poverty,<\/a> their governments are only interested in giving them mandatory ID cards to access<\/span> private services<\/a>, vote (inevitably), collect social security, <\/span>open a bank account,<\/a> travel and like in Italy,<\/a> show on demand to law enforcement officials. The reality appears to be that some form of global control grid is coming down hard on the people living not just in Asia but all around the world and soon may come to us unsuspecting UK citizens too.<\/span> The plan is to integrate this into the new security features for travel. I.e. in the New World you will need to present your approved global standard biometrics ID card <\/span>to travel abroad<\/a>. Seeing as this is only the beginning the strategy appears to be to move then down to national travel, railway stations for example, then down to the local level, boarding buses.<\/span><\/p>\n The governments claim all sorts of things for these cards one of them is that it will stop fraud, but the technology approved as the global standard “facial biometrics ID” is the least accurate of all biometrics data.<\/span> “Today’s computer algorithms for automatic face recognition have a truly appalling performance, in terms of accuracy,”<\/span><\/p>\n The recognition software is currently only capable of checking your face, no criminal database checks anywhere, yet. A human being can do that.<\/span><\/p>\n So why has the ICAO “specified facial recognition as the globally interoperable biometric technology for machine-assisted identity confirmation?” <\/span>(link)<\/a> Even the best biometrics technology being rolled out, Iris scans, still fall far short of any kind of security.<\/span> Fingerprints are left everywhere, they are not secure. Also for the estimated 2% of the population who have worn finger pads the scanners wont work. Contact lenses can possibly be manufactured to fool iris scanners. Voice recognition wont work in noisy areas, and can potentially be fooled by computer software.<\/span><\/p>\n Current biometirc technology is not only easy to bypass but fundamentally flawed at even checking the real card owner. It is not ready for global secure rollout.<\/span> Once again the technology is incapable of working with databases and yet huge amounts of money are being pumped into this.<\/span> The government is only interested in selling<\/a> your data, using it to make money. The two motives conflict stongly, keeping it secure and selling it for profit! They do not work together.<\/p>\n![\"The](\"http:\/\/sorrel.humboldt.edu\/%7Erescuers\/book\/Strobos\/TinaPix\/SJewID.gif\")
<\/p>\n![\"http:\/\/wwii-militaria.net\/images\/Germ_Doc_78.jpg\"](\"http:\/\/wwii-militaria.net\/images\/Germ_Doc_78.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"The](\"http:\/\/www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk\/id2.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![](\"http:\/\/www.merkki.com\/images\/potterlelandid.jpg\")
<\/font><\/p>\n
\n![](\"http:\/\/www.nutrimedical.com\/images\/deagle_photo.jpg\")
<\/a>Based underground in a military installation in the United States, huge computer mainframes are in place ready to store, catagorise and search a database of information on the whole population of the earth.<\/span>
\nDr. William Deagle a medical doctor who has worked on secret government projects claims to have visited the underground computer mainframe in 1994, underneath Schriever AFB in Colorado Springs.<\/span>
\ndownload here<\/a><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\nID cards have been rolled out across the world over recent years, Pakistan, Brazil, China, <\/span>India<\/a>, Czechoslovakia and Italy only being a small sample, have finally reached the UK and been forced through by our wayward government.<\/span><\/p>\n
\nThe US supreme court ruled June 2004 that ID must be shown on demand to law enforcement.
\nI suppose its all just to cut fraud.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\nIt is quite possible that this ID card the government so forceful pushed through has exactly the same implications for us as it does for those in communist China or fascist Italy.<\/span><\/p>\n![](\"http:\/\/www.kledzik.strony.pl\/zdjecia\/images\/k1134_5.jpg\")
<\/a>Initially our ID cards (UK) are biometric and will replace our passports but in the future they will be DNA based and the plan appears to be then to have a DNA database for every nation.<\/span> In the United States ID cards are being introduced through driving licenses as few own passports.<\/span><\/p>\n
\nUniversity of Cambridge professor Daugman who developed the international algorithms for Iris recognition <\/span>claims<\/a> it fails 5% to 40% of the time.<\/span><\/p>\n
\nIn the technology testing they relied upon (FRVT2002) a <\/span>New York Times report<\/a> on it concludes “Cognitec, the leading performer on that test, gained a 77 percent rating but its success rate fell to 56 percent when the watch list grew to 3,000.”<\/span><\/p>\n
\nIn February 2002 the US Department of Defense issued a report that found wide discrepancies between manufacturers’ claims of successful biometrics identification rates and those seen in the field. The report found that iris recognition did better than most but one manufacturer’s claim of a 0.5% false identification rate ballooned to 6% during the DOD tests.<\/span>
\nEven 0.5% is not acceptable.<\/span><\/p>\n
\nThe only conclusion can be that this system is destined to fail, possibly designed that way as a political tool to help bring in <\/span>DNA databases<\/a> or <\/span>microchipping<\/a>, both of which are firmly on the agenda.<\/span><\/p>\n
\nMakes you wonder what’s going on surely?<\/span><\/p>\n