{"id":620,"date":"2007-03-05T10:22:47","date_gmt":"2007-03-05T10:22:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/irdial.com\/blogdial\/?p=620"},"modified":"2007-03-05T10:22:47","modified_gmt":"2007-03-05T10:22:47","slug":"kafka-comes-to-home-schooling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/irdial.com\/blogdial\/?p=620","title":{"rendered":"Kafka comes to Home Schooling"},"content":{"rendered":"

ENMESHMENT – A New Threat To Homeschooling Parents<\/b><\/p>\n

Parents who undertake their responsibility to instruct their own children face many challenges, and yet they do not undertake this responsibility lightly.<\/p>\n

Most see it for the awesome responsibility that it is.
\n-It involves a total commitment on the part of a parent.
\n-It involves accepting responsibility for the child\u2019s education, rather than surrendering that responsibility to others.
\n-It involves caring for the child\u2019s entire existence.<\/p>\n

Parents who instruct their own children often must comply with certain governmental \u201cregulations\u201d. Sometimes, those in government may allege that parents who do not send their children to a public school are guilty of \u201ceducational neglect\u201d.<\/p>\n

Parents who instruct their own children know just how false such an allegation is. Parents constantly must \u201ceducate\u201d those who are misinformed about the nature of \u201chomeschooling\u201d.<\/p>\n

Proving that parents who instruct at home are not \u201cneglectful\u201d may be an inconvenience, but has been relatively easy to do. The very fact that we care for, nurture, educate and engage ourselves with our children is proof that we are not neglecting them. Right?<\/p>\n

Wrong.<\/p>\n

Now, a new threat looms on the horizon. It is a threat because it will attempt to prove that a parent is neglectful when they homeschool their children.<\/p>\n

Black\u2019s Law Dictionary defines \u201cneglect\u201d as \u201cto omit, fail, or forbear to do a thing that can be done, or that is required to be done\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n

Webster\u2019s Dictionary defines \u201cenmesh\u201d as \u201cto entangle in\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n

The term \u201cenmeshment\u201d has found its way into psychological and sociological literature. While it is not yet a recognized \u201cdiagnosis\u201d, it has gained apparent widespread popularity among the psychological and sociological community, particularly among those who are intimately involved with governmental agencies in determining whether or not children are \u201cneglected.\u201d<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, the term \u201cenmeshment\u201d has been used, astonishingly enough, to find parents guilty of \u201cemotional neglect\u201d, as one judge put it, because \u201cthere is a fine line between protection and overreaction.\u201d In that case, the parent was found to be \u201cemotionally neglectful\u201d due to \u201cenmeshment\u201d for \u201cfostering in her child a feeling of mistrust toward school officials and teachers.\u201d In one judicial case, the parent simply wanted the school officials and teachers to follow the instructions of the child\u2019s physician to administer medication immediately to the child in the event of an allergic reaction. The psychologist who found that the parent and child were \u201cenmeshed\u201d did so by concluding that the child is \u201cstrongly aligned emotionally and intellectually with his mother, dependent upon her to a very significant degree, and relying on her views and actions to protect him and to keep him alive.\u201d One would think that this would be considered to be the ultimate duty of a parent, the duty to protect and to keep the child alive. The court, however, found the parent and child to be \u201csignificantly enmeshed\u201d such that the parent was deemed \u201cemotionally neglectful\u201d of the child.<\/p>\n

In essence, for a parent to be aligned emotionally and intellectually with a child for the purpose of protecting the child constituted \u201cneglect\u201d.<\/p>\n

This is fundamentally an oxymoron, to say the least. \u201cEnmeshment\u201d would appear to be the opposite of \u201cneglect\u201d, yet, it has proven to be the basis for a court finding of neglect!<\/p>\n

If a parent cannot disprove neglect by protection and care, how can a parent disprove neglect? […]<\/p>\n

Consent of the Governed<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This is one of the most absurd things that I have ever read.<\/p>\n

I have known several children who are severely allergic, and one who is allergic to peanuts. At every school he has ever attended, the staff have been informed of his immediate need for Epinephrine via injection with an ‘Epipen’ should he be exposed to peanut. Not only that, he was not the only child in the school with this requirement, and many of the schools he attended already had well thought out policies in place before he joined the school.<\/p>\n

The need to administer medication immediately to counter anaphylaxis is widely known. It is simply astonishing that this case went before a judge and that no medical professional was there to confirm that this is absolutely normal practice world-wide in cases where people who can suffer anaphylaxis are in situations where it is impossible to have 100% control the foods they are exposed to. It is also amazing that none of the societies and groups dedicated to severe allergies were consulted. A simple google search will bring up many of them. There are bracelets that sufferers with severe allergies wear…need I go on?!<\/p>\n

This is not an oxymoron. It is in fact Orwellian doublethink; the ability to keep two contradictory thoughts in your mind simultaneously and to believe that both are true. Simply astonishing.<\/p>\n

This whole affair reminds me of the ‘W’ sitting non issue that recently made the rounds in relation to toddlers and the way they sit. It is another fad, another false categorization, another reason to medicate, interfere, obstruct, disrupt, destroy and dismantle family life.<\/p>\n

Was there an appeal?<\/p>\n

We have not faced anything as Kafkaesque as Entanglement, but if such nonsense is codified, you can bet that the enemies of Home Schooling will be adding this garbage to their arsenal.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ENMESHMENT – A New Threat To Homeschooling Parents Parents who undertake their responsibility to instruct their own children face many challenges, and yet they do not undertake this responsibility lightly. Most see it for the awesome responsibility that it is. -It involves a total commitment on the part of a parent. -It involves accepting responsibility […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[48,16],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/irdial.com\/blogdial\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/620"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/irdial.com\/blogdial\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/irdial.com\/blogdial\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irdial.com\/blogdial\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irdial.com\/blogdial\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=620"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/irdial.com\/blogdial\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/620\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/irdial.com\/blogdial\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=620"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irdial.com\/blogdial\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=620"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irdial.com\/blogdial\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=620"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}