BLOGDIAL : We are the best

Someone wants in:

"Copyright law is broken. The interpretation of it favours the extremely rich corporations over the artist and small business. This is more true for copyright law than it is of other law, because copyright deals with prima facie evidence and absolutes in the case of, and yet, the corporations prevail over the small business almost every time, whilst systematically trampling over the rights of the public."

I am not a lawyer. I never wanted to be one. The law and I have on a number of occasions nuzzled in a dark corner, as well as had screaming, dish throwing fights. What is a Law?
Laws are an artificial construct created by men of a certain social class to protect property and preserve "order" as the prevailing opinion of their class deems proper. Laws are, with the few exceptions of major consequence i.e. Murder, Rape, about property and it's control. Laws are about income and it's collection. Number plates on cars, taxes, tariffs, birth certificates, all deal with Newtonian objects and their movements both in life and the ebb and flow of commerce. Laws have trickled down from European based society to less fortunate civilizations. The most simple and basic laws, as those listed above are everywhere. The more arcane laws, like copyright, only apply if the society has an existing framework for following the word of law. If a society has a tradition of obedience, even the most absurd laws will stand.
In Hong Kong it is against the law to have or use chewing gum. In Jakarta, it is against the law to eat a Durian Fruit on a public bus. In Munich one can run buck naked through the Englishergarden, but try that on the street, and off you go to the clink.
The copyright law is broken because of two things:
Current 21st Century society has outgrown the original concept of controlling intellectual property for income gain, by usually, a broker of such properties.
Most laws deal with objects. The copyright laws were written when books, sheet music, disks, and piano rolls, held sway. Today, the world has moved on.
Music, or any other audio, can be transmitted via the internet. No more object. No more physical distribution of objects. A one to one transaction between artist and consumer can take place, cutting out the broker. It is an honor to pay an artist for their creative efforts. If an artist would rather concentrate on production rather than distribution, collectives of a number of like minded artists can be formed, a gathering place where one can go to hear new work and download. Huge media groups are swelling and merging like they are going out of style, which is exactly what is happening. The future is small. As small as the screen this is written on.
The second reason that copyright law is crumbling is for a law to work it must have a locale within which the population follows that rule of law. In cyberspace there are no borders.
It is a universe of intellects who communicate amazingly well across the crusty notions of city, state, and continent. A simple set of rules must be adopted and enforced by a sort of cyber United Nations, that sets basic fees, how many times a work can be duplicated, the ability to go after those who would, say, take a photographic image and publish it in a for profit magazine, and have the clout to collect due fees. All of this would protect the artist and their collectives on an individual basis. Visual and recording artists must realize that the landscape has changed. Literally. The giant media groups are extinct. Artists must form a union in cyberspace to represent themselves. The sum of many individuals could be quite powerful, not only financially, but politically, but that's another story...