Dear Sirs and Madams,

My name is Ulukman Mamytov and I am the attorney for jetgroove.com.

I bring you apologies from JetGroove for making you worry about your copyrights infringements and your music repertoire being presented on our website. I want to assure you that jetgroove.com having started a new Online Music Download Service pursues the objective of making your music more wellknown and accessible and ONLY BY LEGAL MEANS.

That means we DO NOT SELL any of your music without obtaining a proper permission (License) from you or other respective rightholders. You can easily check this by trying to purchase any of you music. Everything that you choose to put in your cart will have status: "Not Available For Purchase Yet". It could only be put "ON HOLD". And we do not change that status untill the contract is signed and your permission is granted. In this case all of your music will be given "Allowed for Selling" status and people who have it in their shopping carts will be able to buy it.

The experince of showing your music on our website without distributing aimed to draw your attention to us, with further goal to make contacts with you on friendly terms with a perspective of mutually beneficial partnership. We're glad to inform you that your music is getting popular indeed through our website and we can let you know at any time how many of your tracks were put on hold and which ones.

However, we deeply understand your concerns and would like to assure you, if you find our relationships impossible, we will IMMEDIATELY delete all of your music from our music collection.

Hope you'll find our offer to make your music more popular through us rather reasonable and we can start that mutually beneficial partnership.

Very Truly Yours,

Ulukman Mamytov
Jetgroove LLP
Legal Department


We recieved the following in May of this year from Jetgroove:


> Dear Sir of Madam,
>
>
>
> Our company Jetgroove, LLP (http://www.jetgroove.com/) is interested in
> business relations with your Record Label. We believe that you will find our
> offer attractive.
>
>
>
> Below are the details of our possible business relations.
>
>
>
> 1. We either acquire at our own expense your tracks and CDs and transfer them
>  into mp3 format, or you provide them to us in any convenient for you form.
> Your company grants us rights to distribute all your music on Internet
> through our website. From our side we guarantee paying you 60-65% of our
> income from selling your music. Money will be transferred once a calendar
> quarter unless the sum is below 100 US dollars.
>
>
>
> 2. Depending on the format in which we acquire your tracks, your Record Label
>  will receive the following royalties:
>
> -        60% - if we acquire tracks and transfer them into mp3 format at our
> own expense;
>
> -        62% - if you provide us with records of your tracks in form of CDs,
> Vinyl, CDRs etc. and we only transfer them into mp3 format;
>
> -        63.5% - if you download your tracks in mp3 format to our website
> (our interface will allow it)
>
> -        65% - if you provide us with your tracks before the date of their
> official release.
>
>
>
> 3. In that way the following distribution of profits will take place:
>
> -        60-65 % to your record label
>
> -        8-12 % to MCPS or RIAA
>
> -        23-32 % to Jetgroove, LLP
>
>
>
> 4. On our website you will have access to the following features:
>
> -        you will be able control the number of your tracks sold;
>
> -        you will be able check total traffic of downloaded music by genres;
>
> -        you will be able also upload tracks straight to our website without
> any assistance, providing fast access for customers to your releases.
>
>
>
> 5. The selling price would be:
>
> -        Tracks (less than 6 minutes) - $0.99
>
> -        Tracks (more than 6 minutes) - $1.25
>
> -        CD’s - $12-16, depending on the number of tracks on CD
>
>
>
> 6. If you reply to this offer and sign our contract 3 days after receiving
> it, all your royalties will be increased by 0.1%.
>
>
>
> Hope this letter will be a beginning for future, long lasting and mutually
> profitable relations between your Record Label and Jetgroove, LLP.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alena Chakhnazarova Jetgroove, LLP Moscow Tel:  +7 095 730 8046 London Tel: +
> 44 0870 068 4866 London Fax: +44 0870 068 4892 E-mail:
> alena.chakh@ru.corp.jetgroove.com

The seven Austrians are fluent English speakers but were left confused by patients feeling "jiggered" or "manky".

"There's things like 'fizog' for face, and 'lugholes' for ears. Even 'ey oop', when they mean hello."

YORKSHIRE TO ENGLISH Ey oop = Hello Fizog = Face Lughole = Ear Jiggered = Exhausted Manky = Rough Our lass = Wife Gipping = Vomiting

Terms that some patients use for more delicate areas of the body are also explained in the guide.

"It's helpful to build up that patient and doctor relationship, and it helps with their diagnoses because they can understand what the patient is presenting with," Mr Carpenter added.

A host of anatomical terms are set out for a person's "bits", including "doofer", "sparrow", "widgy" and "Uncle Sam" for penis and "floo" and "tuppence" for vagina.

"Noggling" is defined as an indescribable chronic pain, and "boggles" is a nasal discharge.

"We knew that the dictator had a history of using weapons of mass destruction, a long aggression and hatred for America, a country listed by both Republican and Democratic adminstrations as a state sponsor of terror."

It was a sponsor of terror that made Iraq the right target, the president says, to ultimately protect the United States -- to fight the battle overseas so that our country does not have to fight a war here at home.

"This nation is determined. We'll stay in the fight until the fight is won!"

"Saddam Hussein's regime is despicable, he is developing weapons of mass destruction, and we cannot leave him doing so unchecked.

"He is a threat to his own people and to the region and, if allowed to develop these weapons, a threat to us also."

"It [the intelligence service] concludes that Iraq has chemical and biological weapons, that Saddam has continued to produce them, that he has existing and active military plans for the use of chemical and biological weapons, which could be activated within 45 minutes, including against his own Shia population; and that he is actively trying to acquire nuclear weapons capability..."

"The intelligence is clear: (Saddam) continues to believe his WMD programme is essential both for internal repression and for external aggression.

"The biological agents we believe Iraq can produce include anthrax, botulinum, toxin, aflatoxin and ricin. All eventually result in excruciatingly painful death."

"If we don't act now, then we will go back to what has happened before and then of course the whole thing begins again and he carries on developing these weapons and these are dangerous weapons, particularly if they fall into the hands of terrorists who we know want to use these weapons if they can get them."

"We are asked now seriously to accept that in the last few years-contrary to all history, contrary to all intelligence-Saddam decided unilaterally to destroy those weapons. I say that such a claim is palpably absurd."

"There are literally thousands of sites. As I was told in Iraq, information is coming in the entire time, but it is only now that the Iraq survey group has been put together that a dedicated team of people, which includes former UN inspectors, scientists and experts, will be able to go in and do the job properly.

"As I have said throughout, I have no doubt that they will find the clearest possible evidence of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction."

"I don't concede it at all that the intelligence at the time was wrong.

"I have absolutely no doubt at all that we will find evidence of weapons of mass destruction programmes."

"The Iraq Survey Group has already found massive evidence of a huge system of clandestine laboratories, workings by scientists, plans to develop long range ballistic missiles."

"I don't think it's surprising we will have to look for them. I'm confident that when the Iraq Survey Group has done its work we will find what's happened to those weapons because he had them."

"Repressive states are developing weapons that could cause destruction on a massive scale."

What you can say is that we received that intelligence about Saddam's programmes and about his weapons that we acted on that, it's the case throughout the whole of the conflict.

I remember having conversations with the chief of defence staff and other people were saying well, we think we might have potential WMD find here or there.

Now these things didn't actually come to anything in the end, but I don't know is the answer. And what I do know is that the group of people that are in there now, this Iraq survey group, they produced an interim report."

"I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that the intelligence was genuine.

"It is absurd to say in respect of any intelligence that it is infallible, but if you ask me what I believe, I believe the intelligence was correct, and I think in the end we will have an explanation."

"What is true about (ex-Iraq Survey Group head) David Kay's evidence, and this is something I have to accept, and is one of the reasons why I think we now need a new inquiry - it is true David Kay is saying we have not found large stockpiles of actual weapons."

"What we also know is we haven't found them [weapons of mass destruction] in Iraq - now let the survey group complete its work and give us the report... They will not report that there was no threat from Saddam, I don't believe."

"I have to accept we haven't found them (WMD) and we may never find them, We don't know what has happened to them. "They could have been removed. They could have been hidden. They could have been destroyed."

"We expected, I expected to find actual usable, chemical or biological weapons after we entered Iraq.

"But I have to accept, as the months have passed, it seems increasingly clear that at the time of invasion, Saddam did not have stockpiles of chemical or biological weapons ready to deploy."

"The evidence about Saddam having actual biological and chemical weapons, as opposed to the capability to develop them, has turned out to be wrong. I acknowledge that and accept it. I simply point out, such evidence was agreed by the whole international community, not least because Saddam had used such weapons against his own people and neighbouring countries.

"And the problem is, I can apologise for the information that turned out to be wrong, but I can't, sincerely at least, apologise for removing Saddam.

"The world is a better place with Saddam in prison not in power."

"I can apologise for the information being wrong but I can never apologise, sincerely at least, for removing Saddam. The world is a better place with Saddam in prison."