Diamonds are a Cryptographer's Best Friend

Listen to or download the mp3 or Ogg files. (what's ogg?)

Dr. James Rabeau with microwave oven - Courtesy, Paul Richiardi

Related Links

University of Melbourne Release

Preprint of paper in Applied Physics Letters, 86, 134104 (2005)

From the Author
I have recently been made aware of several websites that focus on The Anarchist Cookbook. As the author of the original publication some 30 plus years ago, it is appropriate for me to comment.

The Anarchist Cookbook was written during 1968 and part of 1969 soon after I graduated from high school. At the time, I was 19 years old and the Vietnam War and the so-called counter culture movement were at their height. I was involved in the anti-war movement and attended numerous peace rallies and demonstrations. The book, in many respects, was a misguided product of my adolescent anger at the prospect of being drafted and sent to Vietnam to fight in a war that I did not believe in. [...]

The central idea to the book was that violence is an acceptable means to bring about political change. I no longer agree with this. [...]

During the years that followed its publication, I went to university, married, became a father and a teacher of adolescents. These developments had a profound moral and spiritual effect on me. I found that I no longer agreed with what I had written earlier and I was becoming increasingly uncomfortable with the ideas that I had put my name to. In 1976 I became a confirmed Anglican Christian and shortly thereafter I wrote to Lyle Stuart Inc. explaining that I no longer held the views that were expressed in the book and requested that The Anarchist Cookbook be taken out of print. The response from the publisher was that the copyright was in his name and therefore such a decision was his to make \226 not the author's. In the early 1980's, the rights for the book were sold to another publisher. I have had no contact with that publisher (other than to request that the book be taken out of print) and I receive no royalties.

Unfortunately, the book continues to be in print and with the advent of the Internet several websites dealing with it have emerged. I want to state categorically that I am not in agreement with the contents of The Anarchist Cookbook and I would be very pleased (and relieved) to see its publication discontinued. I consider it to be a misguided and potentially dangerous publication which should be taken out of print.

William Powell

[...]

Now his children will be drafted to fight in Iran. Hmmmmm.

Someone clever said:

Tisk Tisk, December 20, 2004

Racists spinning this entry

It looks for the moment that the racists are determined to keep in the vile 'Race and physical appearance' (now named renamed 'Demographics') section with its racist terminology intact.

The Europe page will not have anything to do with this racist nonsense, instead, pointing all this discussion to other articles. See the discussion page there.

Distinguishing between people based on what they look like makes you a racist. Anyone that puts that 'Demographics' section back intact is just that. You cannot treat the discussion of Europe differently to the discussion of Africa just because the people in each region happen to look different to each other.

Either both the Europe article and the Africa article have 'race' sections in them or they both should not. What is most absurd and offensive is the current situation where one article is treated differently to the other; this is more wrong than if both articles had an erroneous/racist/fallacious section on 'race'.

Yawn. I live in a country on this continent where any mention of anything related to race or skin colour or any somesuch immediately gets you branded a racist. Playing the racism card is getting quite worn out by now. People are different, and not everyone around the world realises the extent of differences between people. If that section can shed some light on what the make-up of Africa is to someone living in China having no feeling for the rest of the world, it should be there — that's the point of an encyclopedia. Deal with the fact that we live in a rainbow world, and calling "orange" by any other name doesn't make it less orange.

Furthermore, I don't give a rat's ass what they do on the Europe page. We aren't in any way bound by what they decide there, and this page will grow through consensus from the editors here. That is the wiki way; take it in that spirit, or find another project to invest your time in. Dewet 21:28, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You might not give a 'rats ass', but everyone in the world gave much more than a 'rats ass' about your country when it was being run by racists. It is very important that the two articles are consistent. There is no reason why both articles should not have a 'race' section, or both of them not. What is intolerable is one does and one does not, only (its seems) because Africans are 'brown' in the majority.

This is the issue here; if people are all the same then treat them the same. If the are different, then treat them as such, but be consistent about it, and certainly not flippant.

One can customarily divide the Slavs into the following subgroups:

• East Slavs:
  • Russians
    • Lipovan Russians
  • Ukrainians
    • Rusyns (Ruthenes)*
      • Lemko
      • Bojko
      • Hucul
  • Rusyns (Ruthenes)*
    • Lemko
    • Bojko
    • Hucul
  • Belarusians
    • Poleszuks (transitional between Ukrainians and Belarusians)
• West Slavs:
  • Lechitic group allegedly includes Poles, Pomeranians and Polabian Slavs
  • Poles
    • Mazurians
    • Polanie
    • Silesians*
    • Warmiaks
    • Pomeranians
      • Kashubians
      • Slovincians
      • Kociewiacy
      • Borowiacy
  • Polabian Slavs
    • • Volinians (Velunzani)
      • Pyritzans (Prissani)
      • Veleti (Wiltzi)
      • Abodrites (Nortabtrezi).
  • Czechs
    • Moravians*
  • Moravians*
  • Slovaks
  • Vojvodina Rusyns
  • Sorbs (Lusatians, Serb-Lusatians)
• South Slavs:
  • Bulgarians
    • Muslim Bulgarians (Pomaks)
  • Macedonian Slavs
    • Torbesh
  • Bosniaks
    • Muslims*
  • Muslims*
  • Croats
    • Bokelji Croats
    • Bunjevci*
    • Janjevci
    • Molise Croats
    • Burgenland Croats
    • Šokci*
  • Bunjevci*
  • Šokci*
  • "Yugoslavs"
  • Serbs
    • Krashovans
    • Montenegrins*
    • Gorani*
  • Gorani*
  • Montenegrins*
  • Slovenians
    • Karantanians (Proto-Slovenes)

(*) Classification disputed.

[...]

Classification? Classification?

I see Seabhcán changed the Race section in Africa to Demographics. Europe could have a Demographics section with Demographics of the European Union as main article. ("Demographics of X" seems to be a Wikipedia title convention, but in this case Demographics of Europe is a smaller stub.

I'm curious why the anonymous poster at top of section thinks Europe has to have a Race section if Africa does. I agree with Rama etc. that current European attitudes seem to consider discussion of native racial differences within Europe to be old-fashioned and a waste of time if not actually harmful. There are probably more Americans concerned with it. It's interesting that the nordish.com Race section which was cut was written by an American and uses only American Presidents as example individuals.

There's controversy and material aplenty about European and other race at Caucasoid, Negroid, Extra-European Caucasoid, Northern Eurasian Supercluster, Caucasian race, Whites, Validity of human races, Race (historical definitions), Race etc. You probably want to keep this stuff out of Europe or even the Demographics of Europe articles but just link if necessary.--JWB 20:02, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

"I'm curious why the anonymous poster at top of section thinks Europe has to have a Race section if Africa does."

??? Thats very interesting indeed. The question is this; is Europe a continent populated by one type of person, and Africa is not, or are the continets of Africa and Europe both populated by different types of people that can be identified by their 'Race and physical appearance'?

If anyone claims that Europe contains a homogenous population, then Africa too has just such a population, and niether article should have a'Race and physical appearance' section.

Interesting how "discussion of native racial differences within Europe to be old-fashioned and a waste of time if not actually harmful." But in Africa this is OK? Because of what exactly?

Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary:

a: no longer in use
b: of a kind or style no longer current

Tom Carlson:

lovable old stuff that is sometimes still pretty useful; a term of endearment rather than derision

We Buy Classical LPs

We are always keen to buy quality, saleable classical LPs. We travel the length and breadth of the country to collect quality collections and pay top prices for desirable LPs.

If you have a collection you wish to sell, please get in contact with us. If you have them catalouged in a document, please send that. If not, it is helpful if you could supply some information:

1) Approximate number of records in the collection (50, several hundred, several thousand?)
2) Approximate age of the collection, eg. mid 1950s to early 1970s (please note a date on the record sleeve itself will probably not be the date of issue, but the copyright date of the recording on a later reissue - most of the original issues up until the early 1960s did not have a date on them at all)
3) Your Location and ideally a phone number so we can call with any questions
d) Some idea of the content of the collection (see next page) If you can, it would be helpful if you could include a summary of some of the main labels. For example, 'I have about 400 records including 19 SXL 2000s, 23 Columbia SAX and 11 early HMV ASDs'.
We buy complete collections which have a reasonable percentage of collectable records (for example, the above example would probably be worth buying, but a 400 record collection with 2 SXL 2000s and 1 Columbia SAX probably wouldn't - but it all depends on the actual records in the collection).
You might like to read this article on selling classical record collections published in a record colletors magazine a few years ago - it is written by an American dealer, but it all applies to UK collections. Incidentally, we do pay more for collectable records than the example used in the article.

We are also keen to buy from experienced collectors wishing to trade their records and individuals who go out looking for records. Maybe you go out buying rock/pop LPs, or enjoy browsing in secondhand shops. See the next page for details of what to look out for.

Please note, we buy only Classical LP records (33 1/3 rpm)

We do not buy 78s
We do not buy Easy Listening
We do not buy Musicals/Shows

Sir Ian's skepticism seems to be informed by Passport Office trials which showed that black people and pensioner, for example, were sometimes not reliably recognised by iris scans, one of the tested biometric indicators. Nonetheless his belief that ID cards are important tools in the fight against terrorism or crimes such as identity theft remains unwavering. [...]

If only you could see what ive seen with your eyes.

Honestly. I wonder what David 'Slick' Lammy and the other 'blacks' in labour think about getting misidentified as big brother contestants...or worse. My days, even the COMPUTERS in the UK think all 'black people' look the same, to the level of teh fucking IRIS!!!

He said it was dangerous for the state not to know the identity of some people and argued the case of Kamel Bourgass, the convicted ricin plotter whose identity remains unknown, proved his point. "In the aftermath of the Bourgass trial with commentators saying this proved there was not a threat to the UK, it was the job of the Commissioner to say this was a real and present threat," he said. ® [...]

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/06/15/id_card_tech/

Teh 'ricin plotter' was CONVICTED. This demonstrates perfectly that you dont have to 'know someones identity' in order to protect the public, all you need is what we have had for over a thousand years, a system of justice that works.

As for it being the job of the Commissioner to say that this was "a real and present threat" that is simply a lie. The 'aftermath' of that case was that it proved the system works as it stands ; the police have more than enough tools to hand to do the important jobs, and that they dont need ID cards to catch the bad guys.

I can tell you this though; if they dare to try and roll out ID cards, no one that is 'black' or 'brown' will enroll for one (especially knowing that the system doesnt work specifically for 'black people') meaning that the police will be sweeping them up constantly...which may cause....a problem.

US expected to abandon Biometric passport plan

Rules requiring Irish citizens to carry high-tech passports when visiting the US are to be dropped because the technology behind the scheme is seen as unreliable. The US Department of Homeland Security had previously set an October 2005 deadline for the inclusion of biometric information chips in the passports of European citizens who avail themselves of the Visa Waiver programme. This programme allows people to make short-term visits to the US without a visa. The chips would have included a variety of biological information about the passport holder, such as their fingerprints and retina scans.

But according to a report in the Sunday Times, Ireland has shelved plans to include biometric chips in passports amid expectations that the US is to abandon its biometric passport requirements.

"Biometrics are just a tool, the real concern is that the information would be used for more than immigration control," said Aisling Reidy, director of the Irish Council for Civil Liberties, speaking to ElectricNews.net. "There is also a significant risk of false positives, that people could be wrongly identified, because the technology is not reliable."

The Sunday Times, meanwhile, quoted a spokesperson from the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs, who said that the US has now recognised the technical challenges involved in implementing biometric information.

Trials carried out in the UK last year, for the purposes of introducing a biometrics-based UK national identity card, showed significant levels of failure in the registration and verification of iris, fingerprint and facial recognition trials involving 10,000 British citizens.

Under a new arrangement, holders of passports that include digital photographs could continue to avail of the visa waiver programme. The latest Irish passports include a secure digital photograph, but do not include biometrical information.

The new arrangement is understood to have been devised following discussions between the US and the European Commission. European officials believe the Americans have taken on board concerns that the move would reduce the number of people traveling to the US for business and leisure purposes.

Biometric passports have been under consideration since 2002, when US legislators passed a law requiring the 27 countries in the Visa Waiver programme to start issuing high-tech passports by October 2004. The deadline was subsequently extended to October 2005.

© ElectricNews.Net

[...]

Woo Hoo!

New Bill Could Make Bush President For Life

Prison Planet | June 14 2005

A House bill has been introduced that would change the 22nd amendment and enable George Bush to remain President for the rest of his political life.

The bill would repeal limitations on a President holding office for a maximum of two terms.

An even darker scenario, Arnold Schwarzenegger is elected as President in 2008 and shorty after the 22nd amendment is abolished, making the Hitler admirer our permanent Fuhrer.

This is the modern day version of the Enabling Act, which allowed Hitler to officially declare himself dictator.

The bill, which can be found at the Library of Congress website here, reads as follows.

[...]

Besides Yahoo Japan Auctions, we also provide services for some small auction sites and literally 100s of online shops and sites. We can handle all kinds of shopping from Japan for you whether you need a small gadget or a difficult to locate part for your car. We take care of everything.

[...]

At last, someone who can get you all the rare J-Goods you need!!

The American company is helping censors remove "freedom" and "democracy" from the net in China with a software package that prevents bloggers from using these and other politically sensitive words on their websites.
[...]

Japan is considering censoring the internet after an 18-year-old boy, who was arrested for throwing a homemade bomb into his classroom, said he had found instructions on how to make it from a website.
[...]

The latter 'story' is reactionary nonsense.

In the first, I wonder whether the civil liberties groups have considered censoring M$ from their computers.

- Name

- Other previous names or aliases;

- Date and place of birth and, if the person has died, the date of death;

- Address

- Previous addresses in the United Kingdom and elsewhere;

- Times of residency at different places in the United Kingdom or elsewhere;

- Current residential status;

- Residential statuses previously held;

- Information about numbers allocated to the applicant for identification purposes and about the documents to which they relate;

- Information about occasions on which recorded information in the Register has been provided to any person;

- Information recorded in the Register on request.

- Photograph

- Fingerprints

- "Other" biometrics (iris recognition);

- Signature

- Nationality;

- Entitlement to remain in the United Kingdom; and

- Where entitlement derives from a grant of leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom, the terms and conditions of that leave.

- National Identity Registration Number;

- The number of any ID card that has been issued;

- National Insurance number;

- The number of any relevant immigration document;

- The number of any United Kingdom passport (within the meaning of the Immigration Act 1971 (c. 77)) that has been issued;

- The number of any passport issued by or on behalf of the authorities of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom or by or on behalf of an international organisation;

- The number of any document that can be used (in some or all circumstances) instead of a passport;

- The number of any identity card issued by the authorities of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom;

- Any reference number allocated by the Secretary of State in connection with an application made for permission to enter or to remain in the United Kingdom;

- The number of any work permit (within the meaning of the Immigration Act 1971);

- Any driver number connected to a driving licence;

- The number of any designated document which is held by the applicant that is a document the number of which does not fall within any of the preceding sub-paragraphs;

- The date of expiry or period of validity of a document the number of which is recorded by virtue of this paragraph.

- The date of every application for registration;

- The date of every application for a modification of the contents of his entry;

- The date of every application confirming the contents of his entry (with or without changes);

- The reason for any omission from the information recorded in his entry;

- Particulars (in addition to its number) of every ID card issued;

- Whether each such card is in force and, if not, why not;

- Particulars of every person who has countersigned an application for an ID card or a designated document;

- Particulars of every notification given by the applicant for the purposes of regulations under section 13(1) (lost, stolen and damaged ID cards etc.);

- Particulars of every requirement by the Secretary of State for the individual to surrender an ID card issued to the applicant.

- The information provided in connection with every application to be entered in the Register, for a modification of the contents of entry in the Register or for the issue of an ID card;

- Information provided in connection with every application confirming entry in the Register (with or without change;

- Particulars of the steps taken, in connection with an application mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) or otherwise, for identifying the applicant or for verifying the information provided in connection with the application;

- Particulars of any other steps taken or information obtained (otherwise than in connection with an application mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b)) for ensuring that there is a complete, up-to-date and accurate entry about that individual in the Register;

- Particulars of every notification given by that individual for the purposes of section 12.

- A personal identification number to be used for facilitating the making of applications for information recorded in his entry, and for facilitating the provision of the information;

- A password or other code to be used for that purpose or particulars of a method of generating such a password or code;

- Questions and answers to be used for identifying a person seeking to make such an application or to apply for or to make a modification of that entry.

- Particulars of every occasion on which information contained in the individual's entry has been provided to a person;

- Particulars of every person to whom such information has been provided on such an occasion;

From Slashdot:

"I'm quite impressed at how the anglosaxon world reacts to ID cards. They are present in most countries, and are a far cry from a fascist tool.

As far as my experience goes, in Italy you can get fined for loitering if you are found without "papers" and you are over 18. Yet nobody ever asked me papers without a good reason (airport, electoral office, and such things). Never seen an evil use of that, and can hardly conceive one."

This from an ITALIAN who comes from the country that brought us Mussolini, and he "cannot concieve of an evil use (for ID cards)".

That my friends, is ASTONISHING.

And this is from a Swede:

"Sweden has had a system like this since 1960 or so. Whenever I do anything I give them my social security number (equivalent) and that's all I need. You cannot do anything in Sweden without one, unless you're all cash.

If I pay with a credit card I have to show ID. Identity theft is extremly rare here, I never even consider it. Very little personal business involving identity is done without showing for instance a drivers license (which also contains the Personal Identity Number).

The UK system of showing a gas bill or alike is just weird for someone like me."

Well, to us, this is VERY BAD INDEED. Of course, you are free to live in your country in any way you want. If it if required in your land that you get on your knees every time you want to transact, then that is your business, and not ours. The British are not slaves, idiots or people who do not own their own destinies, unlike others. What is "just weird" to a person like me is that otherwise intelligent people cannot understand, given all the history of Europe, how centralized and compulsory ID is simply unnaceptable. How the Belgians for example, simply accept as 'normal' that they cannot leave their own house and go into their own streets without ID. Appalling.

Rio has its say:

"the government already knows who you are. you pay taxes dont you ? if you pay taxes the government knows who you are, how much you money you make, how much you spend, if you leave the country they know, when you return the customs records your entry in the country...

an ID card can be very usefull. we have them in brasil since... well, my grandmother still had hers RG (Registro Geral = general registry) from 1946...

when someone have an accident here, the first thing paramedics do is check if the person is carying an RG card to know who he/she is, makes identification in case of death easier, proves that you are who you say you are when using a credit card or check.

a government issued ID only adds to convenience, IMHO."

"They are already half way up your ass, why not push it all the way in"

Boa Tarde fila da puta!

The Belgians weigh in:

"I live in Belgium and I have had an identity card since the age of 12. You are obliged to carry it at all times. Not a single person has ever made a fuss about it, and I don't see what all the fuss is about in the UK at the moment.

Last night I was watching a programme on the BBC where a young man was giving false id information to the police - that kind of business could easily be halted by just presenting an id card."

I've had enough of you already.

The Enemy Within speaks:

"

• UK administration might actually start working
• You can for once prove you are who you are in the UK
• No need for that silly census where they try to guess how many people live in their own country
• For the normal law-abiding citizen it will actually be easier to acquire a new driving license or passport should you have lsot the old one.
• Improved information flow through the public sectors, e.g. if you become unemployed and go to the job centre or such like, your tax code can be updated right there instead by changing your status.
• Credit card scams are ripe in the UK with people stealing identities and having to provide an absolute minimum of ID to empty your account.
• Just because it wasn't part of the empire doesn't mean you can't use it!"

As the Second Reading of the Identity Cards Bill approaches, NO2ID have
initiated a pledge for those who will resist compulsory registration for
a State-issued ID card. This is the first in a series of pledges
intended to demonstrate the depth and breadth of opposition to the
proposals BEFORE the legislation makes it through Parliament. Speed is
therefore of the essence.

Please, if you can, make your pledge at http://www.pledgebank.com/refuse
and pass on or promote this message/link to as many sympathetic people
and groups, mailing lists, bulletin boards and publications as you can
*without spamming*. To spread the message further PledgeBank provide
flyers and posters to print out, and people can also pledge by texting
'pledge refuse' to 60022 [standard text rate]. N.B. if you prefer to
keep your online pledge private, simply uncheck the 'Show my name on
this pledge' box before signing.

Our first pledge and target is as follows:

"I will refuse to register for an ID card and donate £10 to a legal
defence fund but only if 10,000 other people will also make this same
pledge."

— Phil Booth, NO2ID National Coordinator

Polls have shown for some time that 3 - 4 million people across the UK
strongly oppose the Government's plans to introduce ID cards and a
National Identity Register. Were this many of us refuse to cooperate
then the scheme would be doomed to failure.

If the Government do manage to force through the ID cards legislation,
this pledge will not only demonstrate the level of solidarity amongst
opponents of the scheme - it will form the basis of a fighting fund* and
support network for all those who refuse to comply.

NO2ID continues to campaign against the introduction of ID cards and the
National Identity Register on all fronts, for more information on what
you can do NOW, please visit www.no2id.net

Many thanks to MySociety for building the PledgeBank site, and to you
all for your continued support - together we shall beat this.

Phil Booth

*all monies pledged will be held in trust for use in defending those
individuals who are prosecuted for resisting registration.