Thursday, December 15, 2005

Apparently the government is going to reduce investment in speed cameras - by gathering the revenue from fines centrally they are allegedly going to spend the money on other road safety features, but you have to wonder what proportion is going to be laundered to fund the ANPR surveillance system, which doesn't seem to have been shelved.


FREEDOM WELCOMES CAREFUL DRIVERS
Please drive slowly


-

While I'm being critical it was woefully predictable that the UK government was only cajoled into some sort of action (i.e. a denial of the obvious) on the 'dubious' CIA flights once it was reported that the detainees were being shipped to EU countries and not just the sort of country whose politics can be swept under the carpet , or even better be used for the UK government's own planned extraditions of alleged 'terrorists'.
posted by meau meau , 10:55 AM Þ 
Wednesday, December 14, 2005

The European Parliament this morning voted in favour of a backroom deal
that had been made between the two big parties in Brussels and the Council
of Ministers, currently chaired by the UK. The deal completely ignored the
amendmends proposed by the Parliament's Rapporteur and by the Justice and
Civil Liberties Committee that was (well - officialy) in charge of the
process. After a hot debate and a number of signs of cracks in the party
blocks, a majority of 378 parliamentarians voted in favour of mandatory
retention of telecommunications data, 197 against, 30 abstained.

This is in short what we will get now:

- retention of telephone and internet connection data (including email
addresses) and location data for mobile phone calls
- no harmonisation of the retention period (6 to 24 months but longer is
allowed: Poland wants 15 years)
- no harmonisation of cost reimbursement for the needed investments on the
providers' side
- no limitation to certain types of crimes for which access is allowed
- retention of unsuccessful call attempts
- no independent evaluation
- no extra privacy safeguards
- follow-up committee without representation from civil rights organisations

Civil liberties organizations, consumers organizations and all the telco
industry associations as well as journalists associations had been
fighting like hell against this major and unprecedented surveillance plan
until the last minute. We did not win (the outcome is in fact the worst
possible, exactly what the UK home affairs minister Clarke wanted), but we
at least raised a lot of awareness and disturbed the conservative and
social-democrat party lines. But the UK council presidency had pushed so
hard after the London bombings that this directive will enter the EU
history as the one which took the shortest time ever from the first
Commission draft to the final vote (less than three months - normally they
need years).

The next steps will be the adoption by the Council of Ministers (before
christmas) and then the implementation process into national laws. There
will be challenges to this plan before the constitutional courts. I am
pretty sure that the German constitutional court will not like it, as it
recently had ruled unconstitutional a major eavesdropping plan on phone
calls - and that one was only directed at suspicious persons, whereas the
EU directive applies to every single communication of all 450 Million
inhabitants of the EU.

More information, including recordings of the EP debate, is available at
.

Ralf
(European Digital Rights, www.edri.org)
posted by Irdial , 5:28 PM Þ 
Tuesday, December 13, 2005

AM ' would go to jail' over ID cards

IC Wales | December 12 2005

A prominent Plaid Cymru AM has vowed to go prison rather than carry an ID card.

Leanne Wood said she has signed up to a civil disobedience campaign against the Government’s ID cards plan.

Ms Wood, the Welsh Assembly’s shadow social justice minister, said the cards were an “expensive Big Brother device”.

“If for some reason you get picked up by the police and you don’t have your card or you’ve lost it, you could well end up behind bars,” she said.

“We in Wales may have saved ourselves from some of the waste of money by saying that devolved services will not have to deal with ID cards.

“But the UK Government is forcing this plan through and, sooner or later, they will require people who refuse to carry ID cards to go to prison.

“I’m ready to go to prison, if the Government presses ahead with this dangerous plan.”

Ms Wood, a former probation officer, added: “I still hope the Bill will be defeated, but if not I am ready to go behind bars.

“I do not believe that I should have to identify myself as a matter of course. I am also pledging that if plans go ahead to link the ID card to people’s right to hold a passport, I will challenge it in court.” [...]

IC Wales
posted by Irdial , 1:05 AM Þ 
Monday, December 12, 2005

applestickers 8
posted by captain davros , 12:36 AM Þ 
Home
 
People
 
Services
 
Articles
 
News
 
About


Subscribe to “Irdial-List” Our Mailing List.
The Blarchives are here.
The Blogs on irdial.com are powered by WordPress.
Here is the Blogdial Atom XML feed.
Here is the Blogdial Feedburner XML feed.
Open Content 1995-2005 Irdialani Limited. All Rights Relinquished where applicable.
Links: STAND FIPR PI PF NUFORC M2M SB FTT FFF RMS A-SCROB ONGAKU Blogroll BLOGDIAL WOE CHEZ MANNING