There
is a trend in professional recording
equipment, which is probably as insane as technological change is
ever going to get. Evidence of this insanity can be found when you
read any of the current music technology magazines, like the excellent
‘Sound on Sound’.
Several companies around the world are designing,
manufacturing and selling valve signal processors the purpose of
which is to 'add warmth' to digital recordings!
In the November issue of ‘Sound on Sound’,
there are articles and advertisements on this new breed of booby-hatch
equipment. The ‘SPL Charisma 8 Channel Valve Signal Processor’,
(an 8 channel valve signal processor) article begins like this:
'More and more people are choosing digital recording systems,
which is creating a spin-off market for valve processors designed
to lend a more comfortable warmth to the resulting recordings. Hugh
Robjohns looks at an SPL unit being touted as the ideal partner
for eight tracks of digital (£1409)'
We never
once imagined that this level of complete madness would
ever come to pass. People are switching to digital Hard Disc multitracking
/ DAT mastering, and then buying processors that cost the same as
superior analogue machines to make their digital machines sound
analogue!! Are they completely crazy?
Witness the advertisements of a manufacturer:
‘The new VTP-1 from Digi Tech offers a unique blend of essential
components that can help you, the digital studio owner, add that
missing warmth to your recordings.’ They go on to say that this
box will, ‘Warm up your digitally recorded tracks’ and should
be used for ‘stereo recording direct to DAT’ (oh please!)
Notice how the text says ‘add missing
warmth’. If this warmth is missing from the recordings in the
first place, the recording equipment should have been be rejected
as inadequate in the first place. There is too much slavish
adherence to the ‘new technology’ mantra which has defrauded millions
of people and destroyed the work of artists all over the world.
The skills involved in making a judgment and evaluating equipment
seem to have atrophied in the past 20 years, and anyone who commits
the heresy of demonstrating the weakness in the new generation of
equipment is burned at the stake, the fire provided being the white
heat of technology.
|
Owners of these
digital studios have made a mistake.
Instead of attempting to apply a plaster to bring a dead dog back
to life, they should sell up their HD recording systems, and go 16
or 24 track analogue multitrack. Then, all of their music would have
the sound that they desire, without having to run the signals through
an unnecessary and distortion creating device.
Boys and Girls, it is very simple; if you
want recordings that sound good, you must go Analogue multitrack
and Analogue master, it is as simple as that. It doesn’t matter
what shiny new boxes the equipment manufacturers are offering; studios
must stick to what works for
music, not what looks good
on a studio spec sheet. Everyone has heard the stories of how sessions
have been ruined/lost because a hard disc crashed; 100% reliability
is the only reliability that is acceptable, anything less is crazy.
Digital recording, in its current incarnation, does
not work. If you run a recording
studio, you should not use it for multitrack recording and you should
not use it for the mastering your recordings. You should use analogue
multitrack recording only, with or without Dolby noise reduction.
For mastering, you should use only reel to reel recorders or high
quality cassettes. Those are the only options available to you.
Here are some facts about
why HD/Digital recording sucks:
- It sounds bad
- It is subject to unrecoverable data
loss
- Archiving is extremely dangerous
Here are some facts about
why Analogue recording is superior:
- It sounds good
- Unrecoverable music loss occurs only
upon the total destruction of the medium
- Archiving is excellent
|