The Upside down world of the Bliar Regime
October 1st, 2006Flights from UK ‘escape US bans’
Passengers flying from UK airports will not be affected by a EU-US row over US demands for information on passengers, the British government has said.
The Department of Transport (DoT) said it had taken out an air navigation order, so planes flying to the US would escape potential American landing bans.
So, where there was actually no potential at all for any sort of ban, since the economic damage would be so great as to make such a move impossible, HMG decides to cave in anyway.
It means airlines can pass information to the US without running into legal trouble under data protection laws.
The action came as a deal between the EU and US remained in doubt.
A DoT spokesman said: “We took out an air navigation order so planes could have a legal basis for data transfer while the EU-level talks are ongoing.
“It’s a patch, if you like.”
Only in the ‘up is down’, ‘black is white’, ‘day is night’, ‘fast is slow’, ‘true is false’ world of this insane war criminal government could anyone possibly call an action that FACILITATES LEAKS be called ‘a patch’.
You cant make shit like this up.
Planning ahead
Paul Charles, Virgin Atlantic’s director of communications, said the British government had good foresight to put the legal patch in place.
“They took it on that if there was not a deal between the EU and the US then this patch could take effect.
“It means airlines can carry on as normal as if the argument had never occurred, and the agreement was not about to run out.
“It means airlines can go on providing the passenger data that the US require without facing possible legal action.”
In other words, Virgin Atlantic doesn’t care about the privacy of its passengers. And that is a very serious thing indeed. It is one matter to be compelled by the law to do something immoral and then to be affronted by it, but to say that violating your passengers privacy is a GOOD THING is simply astonishing.
Deadline
European and American officials had been holding talks to resolve the dispute on the transfer of airline passenger data before it ran out on Saturday.
The row began in May, when the European Court of Justice ruled against a deal set up following the 9/11 attacks.
Under this agreement, European airlines agreed to supply the American authorities with detailed information about passengers flying into the US.
The two sides had until Saturday to replace the deal, with the Americans warning it may fine airlines or deny them landing rights if they refused to provide such data.
The US government believe the information is vital in their fight against terrorism and called for even more access to information. […]
We all know that this is completely bogus, and the only reason why they want this is to violate the ordinary citizen going about his totally lawful business. I wonder if any other EU countries have ‘patched’ their regulations, and wether or not a legal challenge can be mounted against HMG for violating the rights of the passengers that leave from here to the usa.
Now, for those that feel the compelling need to go to the usa, it is the best bet to take another, non British, carrier so that your personal data remains just that; personal.
October 2nd, 2006 at 9:13 am
In other words, Virgin Atlantic doesn
October 2nd, 2006 at 9:36 am
You got it right, once again M2, but in the wrong order (IMHO). FIRST they should fly on another airline after telling Virgin that they cannot pass their info to the USA, and THEN after they have taken their money elsewhere, try the political solution.
Money is one million times more powerful than any political action, and since these airline live on a financial knife edge, it will be immediately effective, should it actually come off.
I can tell you one thing, all business men who are even periferally connected to internet gambling are now ALL flying from other EU territories or avoiding the USA altogether.