Taking Liberties say ‘More Demonstrations’  

June 13th, 2007 by Irdial 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi

The new film ‘Taking Liberties‘ is all about everything anyone with a brain-cell has understood for years. What is interesting is that on its weblog, when you want to publish a comment it is set to:

“This blog does not allow anonymous comments.”

Nice one. Anonymity and the ability to publish anonymously is an important right:

In the legal tradition, the right to anonymity is integrally related to an individual’s freedom of expression guarantees. Historically, many authors publish anonymously because their message is too controversial and they risk persecution or social ostracization for the content of their speech. Fundamental principles upon which the US Constitution is grounded were first espoused in The Federalist Papers , by “Publius”, the famous moniker used by James Madison and Alexander Hamilton when they wished to publish anonymously. Ironically, George Orwell, author of 1984 and Animal Farm , concealed his name and identity, Eric Blair, out of fear of political backlash for his views. The historical and political use of anonymous speech demonstrates that it is a vital part of freedom of expression and freedom of the press.

Like the right to distribute thoughts and ideas, the right to anonymous publishing is an essential component to freedom of expression guarantees. It protects the most valuable speech in a free society: the views that challenge the status quo, the majority, or government.

The US Supreme Court has historically recognized that the constitution’s freedom of expression guarantees protects a publisher’s right to anonymity. According to the US Supreme Court, the right to speak anonymously, “exemplifies the purpose behind the Bill of Rights, and the First Amendment in particular.” ( McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm ., 514 U.S. 334 (1995). According to Justice Stevens, anonymity is a prerequisite for speech in some cases. He pointed out that the motivation for anonymous publication may be to avoid social ostracism, to prevent retaliation, or to protect privacy. It is anonymous speech that shields individuals “from the tyranny of the majority … [It] protects unpopular individuals from retaliation – and their ideas from suppression – a the hand of an intolerant society.” Id.

In Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Village of Stratton , 122 S. Ct. 2080, 2090 (2002), the US Supreme Court ruled that a municipal ordinance requiring pamphleteers to disclose names implicates “anonymity interests” rooted in the First Amendment’s freedom of expression guarantees. The US Supreme Court also struck down a law requiring citizens to wear identification badges because it violated citizens’ First Amendment right to anonymity. ( Buckley v. Am. Constitutional Law Foun., Inc. , 525 U.S. 182 (1992).

Lower federal courts have specifically extended the right to publish anonymously to the Internet, ruling that “the constitutional rights of Internet users, including the right to speak anonymously, must be carefully safeguarded,” ( Doe v. 2TheMart.com, Inc ., 140 F. Supp.2d at 1097). The First Amendment right communicate anonymously over the Internet was also upheld in ACLU v. Johnson , 4 F. Supp.2d 1029, 1033 (D.N.M. 1998), aff’d, 194 F.3d 1149 (10 th Cir. 1999) and in ACLU of Georgia v. Miller , 977 F. Supp. 1228, 1230 (N.D. Ga 1997), which additionally recognized the constitutional right to communicate pseudonymously on the Internet.

Canadian courts have likewise extended the right to speak anonymously to the Internet:

“Some degree of privacy or confidentiality with respect to the identity of the Internet protocol address of the originator of message has significant safety value and is in keeping with what should be perceived as being good public policy.” Wilkins J. in Irwin Toy v. Doe (2000), 12 C.P.C. (5 th ) 103 (Ont. S.C.J.) [...]

But there is much worse about these people….

What is most galling about them is their ‘what you can do‘ page.

As you know being an avid reader of BLOGDIAL, we understand that demonstrations are totally ineffective, and anyone who asks you to demonstrate is actually a part of the problem.

The only way we can permanently stop war is to think obliquely use common sense and do not do anything that will not permanently fix what is wrong.

We had this debate on BLOGDIAL before the historic march organized by StopWar. Demonstrations are pointless because they do not achieve their ends, and the people who go on them are nothing more than stupid monkeys; the people who organize them are actually working for the enemy. Time and time again we have said this, (and other stuff) and had it proved, sadly.

Now the directors of this film, after everything we have said and witnessed are asking everyone to:

Join Amnesty
Visit and sign up online:
web.amnesty.org/pages/join-eng

Join Liberty
Visit and sign up online:
www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/join

Email Your MP
Demand to know what they are doing about the issues raised in the film:
www.writetothem.com

Join the Mass Lone Demos
Demonstrations take place 5pm to 7:30pm on the third Wednesday of every month, forms [MS WORD] [PDF] must be handed in or sent by recorded delivery 1 week beforehand.

[...]

Joining Amnesty will not cause one law to be repealed, nor will it stop new bad legislation from being enacted.

Similarly, Joining Liberty will achieve absolutely nothing at all.

Emailing the very people who pass the laws that enslave you is just STUPID.

And joining demonstrations we know about, don’t we?

Telling the truth is not enough. Acting is not enough. Correct Action is the only thing that will change what you want changed.

But you know this!

Share/Save

10 Responses to “Taking Liberties say ‘More Demonstrations’”

  1. Alun Says:

    Oh, the nostalgia of old Blogdial run on Blogger. Some excellent discussion and a lot of memories.

    On 2nd June we were in London, outside the Houses of Parliament, discussing how these wondrous buildings had become a functional irrelevance. And there was Brian, on the 6th anniversary of starting his demonstration, still demonstrating.

    And later, at Tate Britain, we saw Mark Wallinger’s State Britain. The replica of Brian’s original full-scale demo before They came in the night and took most of it away. It’s a great piece of work.

    And there they were, the simulacra and the simulations. Demonstration and democracy, freedom and liberty. But which is real? Which has never existed? And which has been placed before your eyes to make you believe what you want to believe?

    http://www.parliament-square.org.uk/

  2. BLOGDIAL » Blog Archive » The mass is mobilizing Says:

    [...] http://irdial.com/blogdial/?p=739 [...]

  3. BLOGDIAL » Blog Archive » Foxes organize liberty for chickens Says:

    [...] Politics is corrupt by its nature. Legitimate protest is worthless and has been for decades. We have been over that before. Sixty years ago Britain was a proud co-author of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and [...]

  4. Home Schoolers of England… unite! | BLOGDIAL Says:

    [...] readers of BLOGDIAL know that the age of writing and signing petitions an demonstrating as a tactic …, that they do not work and that doing them is nothing more than a time wasting feel good activity, [...]

  5. BLOGDIAL » Blog Archive » Finally they are beginning to believe Says:

    [...] Whatever you might think the solution to any particular problem is, one thing is for sure, doing what has not worked is insane, and everyone who calls for more of what does not work is… not helping. [...]

  6. BLOGDIAL » Blog Archive » Richard Dawkins’ Pope Arrest Plot: Full of Fail Says:

    [...] arresting the Pope. This is like singing a song to put out a fire, or holding a candle lit vigil to stop a war. Arresting the Pope will do nothing to solve Dawkin’s problem of the power of religion over [...]

  7. BLOGDIAL » Blog Archive » Top ten ways you can avoid being tracked Says:

    [...] who believe that demonstrating is a useful tool wake up and realise that demonstrations are a form of control. When these millions turn their hands to tactics that are effective, non violent and with discreet [...]

  8. BLOGDIAL » Blog Archive » A call to action from the Coalition of Thieves Says:

    [...] please do that, after all its so very effective! Support the development of a national co-ordinating coalition of [...]

  9. BLOGDIAL » Blog Archive » Bank Run 2010, Eric Cantona forces the tipping point Says:

    [...] the sort of action that BLOGDIAL has advocated for years; we have been saying over and over that demonstrating in the streets is completely pointless, and we were and are completely [...]

  10. BLOGDIAL » Blog Archive » Analysing the Anonymous ‘Open Letter to the Citizens of the United States of America’ Says:

    [...] State is what restricts your liberties. End it, and the restoration of your liberties will follow as day follows night. Uphold the [...]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.