Former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray says the alleged transatlantic liquid bomb plot is staged-managed propaganda on behalf of Bush and Blair – who yearn for a “new 9/11” to absolve them of domestic political trouble.

Murray previously blew the whistle on how the British government was using evidence obtained from torture in Uzbekistan – inflicted on its population US-funded regime of Islam Karimov – the dictator who likes to boil people alive.

Murray questions the intent and capability of the alleged terrorists to carry out the attack and offers the likelihood that evidence of the plot was obtained through torture in Pakistan.

“None of the alleged terrorists had made a bomb. None had bought a plane ticket. Many did not even have passports, which given the efficiency of the UK Passport Agency would mean they couldn’t be a plane bomber for quite some time,” says Murray.

“In the absence of bombs and airline tickets, and in many cases passports, it could be pretty difficult to convince a jury beyond reasonable doubt that individuals intended to go through with suicide bombings, whatever rash stuff they may have bragged in internet chat rooms.”

“Then an interrogation in Pakistan revealed the details of this amazing plot to blow up multiple planes – which, rather extraordinarily, had not turned up in a year of surveillance. Of course, the interrogators of the Pakistani dictator have their ways of making people sing like canaries. As I witnessed in Uzbekistan, you can get the most extraordinary information this way. Trouble is it always tends to give the interrogators all they might want, and more, in a desperate effort to stop or avert torture. What it doesn’t give is the truth.”

Murray describes the alert as “more propaganda than plot,” and points out that of all the Muslim terror suspects who have been charged, 80% have been acquitted and only 2% have ever been convicted on offenses related to terrorism.

Meanwhile, Delhi police in India claim they have concrete evidence that proves collusion between Pakistani intelligence service ISI and the terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) in carrying out militant attacks in India.

One of the alleged mastermind’s of the liquid bomb plot, Rashid Rauf, is a member of Lashkar-e-Taiba. The ISI is a CIA front and the CIA have privately ignored their control of terror groups while publicly lauding Pakistan’s status as an ally in the war on terror.

On Monday night it emerged that elements of MI5 wanted the liquid bomb plot to proceed and make the arrests only after the attack had taken place – sacrificing an estimated 3,000 lives and ensuring Britain experienced its own 9/11. […]

PJW rides again.

The Transatlantic Airplane Bomb Plot Armageddon – DON’T TALK ABOUT IT !

So the Guradian reports “Media must stay silent on suspects“

In a joint statement, The Home Secretary John Reid (and PM in waiting – Our Saviour and our Strength) and Attorney General Lord Goldsmith have called for the media to show “considerable restraint” to avoid prejudicing any future trials.

This presumably relates to the fact that no flight tickets had been bought by the cold blooded (but evidently not well prepared killers) and indeed some of the suspect suicide bombers had not got round to getting a passport (well a real one , maybe they had dud ID)…or that most of the suspects were known to the SIS / Police before 7/7 and had been under surveillance with phone taps, photography – even to the comical level that “suspects stepped up their Internet searches for possible U.S.-bound flights, etc.,” .. master planners at work, evidently REALLY WELL PREPARED AFTER 12 MONTHS OF PLOTTIN’ AND A PLANNIN’. Make the Miami 7 look like professionals.

It is evident that this whole crock of shit is now falling apart – See the Miami 7 , see the “Ricin ” gang, see Forest Gate a raid of 250 cops based on “solid intelligence”, see the rapid release of so many “arrested” under the Terrorism Act.

The truth is that there is not the slightest shred of evidence produced anywhere to put any of these people on trial for attempting to bomb anything, anywhere.

They are just a bunch of infiltrated wannabes who have been exposed for that, to further the career of John Reid at the expense of the travel industry , BAA, and passengers. All these people were known about for over 12 months. The “exposure” discussed and planned on both sides of the Atlantic was aimed to ;

1. Introduce even more draconian measures for controlling the population.
2. To increase the element of fear and justify notching up the new “Critical” threat level.
3. To boost John Reid’s grab for the Premiership (revealed here over 4 weeks ago) and fuckover Gordon Brown’s chances of the top job slot.

The Wise men say (Under dire threat of The Contempt of Court Act 1981 ) “We must avoid the publication of materials which may impede or prejudice the complex and ongoing investigations by the police and avoid the risk of prejudicing potential future legal proceedings or prejudging their outcome.”

It was of course the persistence of Bridget Dunne and many others in demonstrating the absurdity of the published Timeline for the 7/7 bombers – ie that they had jumped on a train at Luton that did not exist which led one of the wise men,The Home Secretary John Reid (and PM in waiting – Our Saviour and our Strength) to tell the Police to correct the record. The Met’s response (AKA Dumb Ox Clarke, Heard of Terrism at the Yard ) was, to say it was the Home Office who stated the time of the train the “suicide bombers” caught from Luton … hmm…er..er the Police are actually part of the Home Office .. do they ever talk to each other in there ? Evidently not. Not Fit for Purpose and yet they pull this stroke.

Far from the chance to “impede or prejudice the complex and ongoing investigations “ it will be entirely helpful if there is the widest public discussion of this whole farrago and charade of incompetence.

The Daily Torygraph report that John Reid (PM in waiting – Our Saviour and our Strength) himself has “prejudged the trials for some of the members (of the plot).” according to David Davies the Tory spokesman, who is quoted from a remark he made on Sky TV. Reid is also embroiled in an argument with Gordon Brown and the Treasury about the publication of the names of suspects (required when their assets are frozen) under UN inspired legislation – which simply underlines his grab at the Prime Minsitership , and his ill concelaed contempt for the fellow Scot from the Lang Toon.

MEDIA ACCURACY

The Sunday Times has a leader on the usual lines, abour disaffected muddle class Muslims and youth etc etc.,it also claims ….

“When an undercover reporter from The Sunday Times visited Beeston in Nottinghamshire, where three of the July 7 bombers came from, he found either a denial that they had been involved or, perhaps more alarmingly, respect for them as Muslim martyrs.”

Please note Mr Murdoch , there is a Beeston in Nottinghamshire , but the Beeston that the three Muslims carrying the bombs on 7/7 came from is in West Yorkshire.100 miles away.

PS. Of course it would be a Godsend if the trial could not be held as if it had been prejudiced, by say the publication by the Bank of England of their names, addresses etc., … wouldn’t it? […]

http://postmanpatel.blogspot.com/

When critical mass is reached, there will be no turning back. there will be no outrage that can be performed, no staged attack, no real attack, that will persuade the British public to eat any more bullshit.

In fact, if a new attack DOES happen, it might just provide the catalasys needed to start off the chain reaction that will blow the whole system to smithereens. The bigger the outrage the more likely people will say ‘enough is enough’. This will only happen however, once the critical mass of refusal is reached in advance. Everyone needs to be primed. If it happens before the mass is prepared, we may still have enough deployed sheeple to absorb the neutrons of change.

Yes, sheeple are like carbon rods in a nuclear reactor; remove them and their dampening effect and a runaway reaction of freedom explodes and contaminates everything.

Hours-long waits in the security line. Ridiculous prohibitions on what you can carry on board. Last week’s foiling of a major terrorist plot and the subsequent airport security changes graphically illustrates the difference between effective security and security theater.

None of the airplane security measures implemented because of 9/11 — no-fly lists, secondary screening, prohibitions against pocket knives and corkscrews — had anything to do with last week’s arrests. And they wouldn’t have prevented the planned attacks, had the terrorists not been arrested. A national ID card wouldn’t have made a difference, either.

Instead, the arrests are a victory for old-fashioned intelligence and investigation. Details are still secret, but police in at least two countries were watching the terrorists for a long time. They followed leads, figured out who was talking to whom, and slowly pieced together both the network and the plot.

The new airplane security measures focus on that plot, because authorities believe they have not captured everyone involved. It’s reasonable to assume that a few lone plotters, knowing their compatriots are in jail and fearing their own arrest, would try to finish the job on their own. The authorities are not being public with the details — much of the “explosive liquid” story doesn’t hang together — but the excessive security measures seem prudent.

But only temporarily. Banning box cutters since 9/11, or taking off our shoes since Richard Reid, has not made us any safer. And a long-term prohibition against liquid carry-on items won’t make us safer, either. It’s not just that there are ways around the rules, it’s that focusing on tactics is a losing proposition.

It’s easy to defend against what terrorists planned last time, but it’s shortsighted. If we spend billions fielding liquid-analysis machines in airports and the terrorists use solid explosives, we’ve wasted our money. If they target shopping malls, we’ve wasted our money. Focusing on tactics simply forces the terrorists to make a minor modification in their plans. There are too many targets — stadiums, schools, theaters, churches, the long line of densely packed people in front of airport security — and too many ways to kill people.

Security measures that attempt to guess correctly don’t work, because invariably we will guess wrong. It’s not security, it’s security theater: measures designed to make us feel safer but not actually safer.

Airport security is the last line of defense, and not a very good one at that. Sure, it’ll catch the sloppy and the stupid — and that’s a good enough reason not to do away with it entirely — but it won’t catch a well-planned plot. We can’t keep weapons out of prisons; we can’t possibly keep them off airplanes.

The goal of a terrorist is to cause terror. Last week’s arrests demonstrate how real security doesn’t focus on possible terrorist tactics, but on the terrorists themselves. It’s a victory for intelligence and investigation, and a dramatic demonstration of how investments in these areas pay off.

And what can you do to help? Don’t be terrorized. They terrorize more of us if they kill some of us, but the dead are beside the point. If we give in to fear, the terrorists achieve their goal even if they are arrested. If we refuse to be terrorized, then they lose — even if their attacks succeed.

New airline security rules:
http://www.schneier.com/
http://tinyurl.com/nxqe4

My emphasis.

Like I said; we must not react to these events, no matter who or what is behind them, because it is the reaction that is desired. I have said this before. I say it again and again. It is true. No matter what happens, no matter how big the outrage, nothing we do must change. Not a single item of the way we live must be altered in reaction to these staged Wizard of Oz showpieces.

Now, when I say, ‘nothing we do must change’ I do not mean that ‘we’ can or should continue to commit mass murder and the blowing of children to bits. We must absolutely withdraw from all flying carpet politricks, and not because people hate Britain over it, and not as a reaction to people allegedly wanting to explode bombs in the UK in retaliation, but because it is wrong to murder people and meddle in the affairs of other countries.

The morons in the street who say that they don’t mind being stripped naked ‘to stop the terrorists’ are actually the real threat to you and me; they are the real ‘enemy within’ and thankfully, because they are on our doorstep, we can access them and turn them around.

Digging around over the last couple of days, I came across this post from October 05 concerning more details about what David Shayler knows and has revealed.

Tony Gosling – 15Oct05 – BRISTOL

This story was to be found neither on UK Indymedia or on Bristol Indymedia as neither appear to be working properly. I spent 30 mins. or so attempting to publish this on both without success, seems this is a scoop Indymedia aren’t interested in.

Ex anti-terrorism officer David Shayler came out with an interesting revelation when stuck in Bristol recently.

There has been much speculation as to how the most right wing and powerful elements in the Labour Party used to be such left wing radicals. Did they have a change of heart? Apparently not, according to Ex MI5 Counter-Terrorism Officer David Shayler.

It would also explain why the spooks have been so busy trying to blacken Shayler’s name.

Ex MI5 anti-terrorism officer David Shayler, who spent three days with us in Bristol recently, when his car got brake failure while parked up at the University, said at his Cube cinema presentation that he had access to information contained in Blair’s Security File while in ‘the service’.

“Tony Blair worked for MI5 before he became Labour leader.”
Evening Post reference http://tinyurl.com/d9b32

The day after Shayler was arrested in France the Mail on Sunday came out with the Headline ‘Shayler Could Bring Down Government’.

On the Monday, Shayler says, Blair Summoned the editor to Downing Street and asked him into the Garden (to avoid bugs) demanding to know what Shayler knew about him (Blair).

The editor wisely explained that due to a government injunction he could not tell Mr Blair anything that Shayler knew or he’d be breaking Blair’s government’s own injunction.

Blair, according to Shayler, had documents in his file which clearly meant he had been spying on his comrades in CND and The Labour Party before being made Party Leader – which explains his so-called radical left activities as a young man – he was a spy reporting back on Communist ‘subversives’ in CND and in the Labour Party!

Shayler says his secret state agent past would make Blair utterly unreliable to hold public office – particularly in the Labour party and would make him a puppet of the hawks in MI6. The same hawks I guess who cooked up the dodgey dossier at our expense which has been used to kill nearly 150,000 Iraqis and open the gates of hell in the Middle East. (oh yes and boost the profits and margins of every single Western Arms business leaving not enough to pay our pensioners and treat people on the NHS properly).

http://www.bilderberg.org/sis.htm#agent

If what Mr Shayler says is true (anyone have any doubt?) and given the history of whats happened in the Labour party, this country and their effect and influence in certain regions of this planet, over the last 15 years.

BBC Give New Labour’s Reid A Leg-Up Whilst The Independent Predicts Literal “Apocolyse” In Britain

In classical BBC style, BBC eventually give in to the New Labour fear propaganda and give John Reid a helping hand, given that the Met haven’t yet pressed any charges under the countless Terrorist Acts that this government have passed and have three more days to do so.

Possible links between the alleged plot to blow up transatlantic jets and the 7 July London bombings are being probed, sources have told the BBC…

Officials in Pakistan said two British men of Pakistani origin have been arrested in connection with the alleged plot.

Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry has identified one of them as Rashid Rauf.

He thought to be related to Tayib Rauf, 22, who was arrested in Birmingham, and is among 19 of the suspects who have had their assets frozen by the Bank of England.

Yes, those trustee Pakistani intelligence officials (whom we cannot name of course, for national security reasons) at the Pakistani ISI intelligence services have definitely made a connection between the 7/7 bombers and the alleged plotters.

What you’re not told of course by our fantastically complicit mainstream media is that the ISI is essentially a sister agency of the American CIA, having been enlarged in the 70s by the Americans to fend off the Soviets from Afghanistan. One of their joint operations was to sell Afghan heroin to the soviet soldiers in order to turn them into addicts.

This won’t be the first joint operation between the two services…allegedly, of course.

Meanwhile, a rare glimpse of critical thinking skills comes from Peter Hitchens at the Daily Mail. Yes, we should all be afraid…of John Reid who is a former Commnuist/Marxist heaviweight, into his adult life, like his previous Blairite counterpart, that liberty dismissing electronic-soft-dictatorship-pushing moron Charles Clarke.

In further developments, whilst doubt is creeping about the true scale of the alleged plot, Mr Reid drops another one for the media to revel in, claiming that at least ‘four major terror plots’ had been foiled in the UK since 2000 – one of them being before 9/11.

Home Secretary John Reid has revealed that “at least four major plots” have been thwarted since the 7 July attacks in London last year.
Dr Reid said the government believes that the first al-Qaeda plot in the UK was in 2000 in Birmingham, preceding the war in Iraq and the 9/11 bombings.

He told the BBC’s News 24 Sunday show that current security measures at UK airports would be “time limited”.

Police are holding 23 people over an alleged plot to blow up several planes.

Yes, that’s right, 9/11 wasn’t really the beginning of the never-ending ‘war on terror’. They didn’t really exploit expertly the fear created by that event at all – it was already there, just so you’re aware.

But the BBC don’t think of asking John Reid for any details whatsoever of this conveniently timed claim. And even if they did, you can guarantee they won’t be able to tell you, for national security reasons, of course. Do however, expect them to not apply any level of critical thinking between the claims of New Labour ministers and reporting such claims to the public.

Yet the mere fact that no charges or convictions have been made does not prevent the Independent from literally predicting that apocolypse is coming. Yes, that’s right. Apocolypse now. There’s been no evidence or proof prevented. But what’s for sure is that ‘al-Qaeda’s leader in Britain’ – someone who hasn’t been mentioned before today but now suddenly appears in the media orgy commentary – may have been arrested as part of the 19, 21, or 23 depending on who you read. They’re not sure, but this new ficticious figure may be there. As part of this alleged plot for apocolypse.

Suspected terrorists were planning to unleash a wave of “apocalyptic” attacks on land and air, using an arsenal of bombs and weaponry, including firearms, investigators have discovered.

Police and intelligence sources have indicated that the alleged plot which was thwarted last week was targeted at the UK, as well as at airliners heading for the US, and could have caused devastating loss of life and destruction on the British mainland. One Whitehall source said “many dozens” of plots were under investigation, involving “hundreds” of suspects.

According to one report last night, al-Qa’ida’s leader in Britain could have been held in the raids. But security sources estimate that as many as 1,200 people here are actively involved with terrorism, and that the country is still under “very severe” threat from other potential terrorist plots. This, they added, explained why there were no immediate plans to lower the current national threat assessment from “critical”, its highest level.

Well, that means that the Independent gets today’s award for the biggest load of gargantuan tripe in a single set of paragraphs by a mainstream newspaper. Written, of course, without any real evidence being presented of the claims made by those whom profit politically from mass fear-mongering.

And you can guarantee, even if any proof of such fantastic claims were presented to the reader, British ministers will catagorically deny any link with their own foreign policy. Of course – because remember, this ‘global’ terrorism hates our freedom, our democracy. That’s why we are allegedly threatened.

Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett was equally forthright, saying people who blamed Britain’s foreign policy for the terrorism threat were making “the gravest possible error.”

“This is part of a distorted view of the world, a distorted view of life. Let’s put the blame where it belongs: with people who wantonly want to take innocent lives,” she said.

Yes, because of course no innocent lives have been wantonly taken in Lebonon, Iraq or Afghanistan, including our own girls and boys, as part of the ‘war on terror’. And we’d better remember that – if you think that, then you must have a distorted view of the world.

And if you think that, in response to this ‘global’ threat to our freedom and democracy, eroding our freedom and democracy isn’t an effective course of action, then you must be soft on terror. Of course.

So I ask again, who needs Stalinist propaganda when you have British mainstream journalists writing a shamefully calculated tirade such as above?

I’ve said it before – if there are convinctions in a fair trial in a British court of law – which typically takes up to two years to begin, when the desired effects of these alerts has taken hold – matching the trumpted up level of claims currently being made by security services, politicians and their media mouths alike, then I will be one of the first to congratulate our security services, and I will personally eat my hat.

But until that time, even on a moment’s brief glance, all of this media junk is nothing but a flailing attempt to win political and monetary income by both the Blairites and the fear-mongering British media. And as always, its the vulnerable who are the easiest targets.[…]

http://seadblog.blogspot.com/2006/08/bbc-give-new-labours-reid-leg-up.html

There are so many people out there who know what is going on it will be easy to unseat the monsters if there is one catalyzing event to galvanize the masses into wholesale rejection.

But I already said this!

The comments of both the Guardian and The Times today are totally immersed in the paralell reality of Bliar and the entirely owned Murder inc. subsidiary.

The first comment on The Guardian (where they have the guts to allow comments) demolishes that insane diatribe entitled, “These ludicrous lies about the West and Islam” perfectly:

“What an appropriate headline this column has.

You forget, for example, that there were American soldiers in Saudi Arabia from very early in the 1990s, well before the WTC bombing.

You forget the vicious overdone sanctions and continual bombing of Iraq both of which continued throughout the 1990s.

You refer three times to ‘war against Islam’ or ‘war on Islam’ – the open letter which prompted your leader does not refer to any such concept.

You write of the absurdity of implying that mass murder is less atrocious when motivated by a sense of grievance. Who has implied this? Certainly not the signatories of the letter.

You, on the other hand, write such words as ‘the conduct of the war in Iraq, regardless of the virtues of removing Saddam…has been riddled with error’. How would you react if someone were to say, ‘the conduct of Al Qaeda, regardless of the virtue of protesting US aggression, has been riddled with error’? War in Iraq and terrorism are both criminal, not simply error-ridden.

If you’re concerned about *mass* murder, about the number of killings, then Al Qaeda with a few thousand dead is to Blair and Bush, with hundreds of thousands dead, as Blair and Bush are to Hitler or Stalin or Mao, with tens of millions dead.

Al Qaeda’s terrorism and Bush and Blair’s wars are both equally unjustified.

Why are you being so defensive? It is absolutely true that Islamic terrorism is provoked by Western aggression against Moslem countries. Tony Blair does not act in the interests of the UK and its people. He doesn’t even act in the interests of the USA, rather he acts in support of George Bush’s mistaken policies.

Why is the Guardian leaping to his defence with, to use your own phrase, such ‘arrant nonsense’?”

indeed. Like I said in an earlier post no one with any education or understanding of this ‘problem’ believes the lies that are being trundled out on rusty whellbarrows by rags like the Guardian and The Times.

There is something interesting however about the screeching screed published by The Times today. It ends with;

[…] This low-level war is going to take a huge effort of will and courage. It is going to mean applying what may seem illiberal measures in order to save lives. In return, the state must exercise massive restraint and not abuse that responsibility. But the real key is for Muslims to realise that their future lies here and to embrace British values and reject violent Islamist theology. The country may indeed be in its greatest danger since the second world war, as John Reid, the home secretary, said last week. But as Britain prevailed then, so it will again.

!!!

It ends with “England Prevails”. And we all know where THAT comes from; that’s the motto of the fascist government of Britain in Alan Moore’s brilliant ‘V for Vendetta’. Whoever wrote that piece for The Times is sending a message that he knows the whole scenario, hysteria and Murdoch driven line that the paper is taking is total bullshit.

No one at The Times is so stupid or deluded that they do not understand (even if they never say so in public or in print) that what is happening today is based entirely on lies, and need not be happening at all. They are all constrained by the people who control that paper, and rather than lose their jobs, they keep quiet…which some would see as a crime…but I digress; someone in there took the risk of putting this message in the paper at a time of extreme hysteria.

Bravo to you.

August 10 2006: Alex predicts the next “terra” attack is just around the corner:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAHqSfDNjaI

Think he is fear mongering? Check out his prediction in July of 2001:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGtOFudmHG8

With all the fake alerts been kicking off for the last 24-36 hours, Im reminded of this old story about the FSB that was about the Moscow suburb bombings that were a precursor to the Russian invasion of Chechnya, where the FSB were caught red handed planting the devices themselves:

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-satter043002.asp

I cant think of a suitable story to attach it as a comment on Blogdial but it needs to be kept in the public consciousness.

A lurker writes…

It should be a cause for concern that only hours before the latest greatest ‘foiled terror plot’ (a dusted-off rehash of Operation Bojinka), Home Secretary John Reid was proclaiming in another speech to Labour think-tank Demos, that traditional liberty was old fashioned and had to make way for whatever fanatical social realignment Gordon Brown and Blair desired.

To add a dash of New Labour-flavoured pretext to this dangerous nonsense, was the statement that another terrorist plot was effectively imminent:

“The hyperactive home secretary – who will mark 100 days in the job this Friday – confirmed that a terrorist attack on the UK was “highly likely”, as signalled by the current “severe” warning on official government websites” ^Guardian

Could it be that former-communist Reid, one of Blair’s favourite multi-purpose attack dogs, reshuffled into position as Home Secretary, swapping out former-communist Clarke after Labour’s rightly disastrous May council elections, was not clairvoyant put merely refering to the political/security timetable, arranging his speech (or adjusting the content of it) just pre-arrests and resulting kerfuffle at airports accordingly to an operation he knew was imminent ?

As Home Secretary, it seems difficult to imagine that Reid would not have been aware of what was behind the ‘severe’ warning (which had been fed out into the press in recent days).

Today “..Reid, said such an attack could have caused civilian casualties on an “unprecedented scale”.

Indeed, but it seems it was quite under control:

“A decision was made to move suddenly following months of surveillance […] There were no firm indications of plans for an attack to have been carried out today, but the US homeland security secretary, Michael Chertoff, said it was a “well advanced” scheme. He said the plot was based in Britain but was “international in scope”.

So let’s get this straight. A well advanced ‘plot’ which had been under surveillence for months, and which there are no firm indications it was being enacted today, is rounded up the day after Reid’s speech telling people to give up their liberty because another terrorist event was imminent.

“The decision to take action was made with the “full knowledge” of Tony Blair, the prime minister, who is abroad on holiday but has been in constant contact with ministers about the unfolding events and spoke to president Bush overnight about the situation”

As such, the event has been spectacularly successful in wiping Israel’s now escalating ground invasion of Lebanon, rubber-stamped by a vacationing Blair, off the front pages. […]

http://jultra.blogspot.com/

Jultra!

Unable to window dress the obvious failure to eradicate growing resistance in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan—even with the mighty propaganda power of a complaisant media—the neocon intelligence apparatus has staged yet another terrorist event, or would be terrorist event.

“The 21 terrorist suspects arrested in the U.K. overnight had a ‘well-advanced plan’ to detonate electronic devices or liquid explosives disguised as beverages or onboard U.S.-bound aircraft, a sophisticated plot suggestive of al-Qaeda, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said,” reports Bloomberg. “The attacks were aimed at U.S.-bound planes of United Airlines, American Airlines and Continental Airlines at London’s Heathrow Airport, the Associated Press reported, citing unidentified [undoubtedly neocon] U.S. counter-terrorism officials in Washington.”

According to White House propaganda minister, Tony Snow (Job), “The president, prime minister and their key intelligence, law enforcement and security officials have been in close and regular contact. And as you would expect, he has spoken to Prime Minister Blair about these developments in recent days.”

Considering past events, including the “terrorist events” of seven-seven and nine-eleven, we can assume select “law enforcement and security officials” were “in close and regular contact” prior to this latest would-be attack as well.

In standard fashion, in order to apply the correct spin from the outset, we are told this latest operation has “global dimensions,” that is to say it will be billed as not only an “al-Qaeda” operation but other designated “global” enemies will be fingered as well.

“Last month, the global militant group al Qaeda called on Muslims to fight those who backed Israel’s attacks on Lebanon and warned of more attacks unless U.S. and British forces pulled out of Iraq and Afghanistan,” reports Reuters.

In the coming hours and days, we can expect the corporate media, eager stenographers for the neocon plan, to connect the dots—blame will be affixed to Iran, Syria, and their “proxy,” Hezbollah, through “al-Qaeda,” now dedicated (or scripted) to help Hezbollah, not that the homegrown resistance group needs any help, especially from a CIA-ISI engineered terror group.

Finally, as attention has now shifted to Muslim bad guys (either imagined or a parade of patsies), Israel will likely increase the severity of its criminal behavior against the civilians of Lebanon and those of Gaza as well, as the American public will be navel gazing video footage of inconvenienced air travel passengers. […]

Kurt Nimmo | August 10 2006

Red Alert For Staged Government Terror Attack
Terror alert a trial balloon for invasion of Iran, World War III

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | August 10 2006

Today’s red level terror alert in symbiosis with escalation of conflict in the Middle East is the trial balloon for a massive staged false flag terror attack, blamed on Hezbollah or Al-Qaeda, that will light the blue touch paper for World War Three.

Radio host Alex Jones, who predicted a staged attack on the World Trade Center involving the use of Osama bin Laden as a fall guy in July 2001, has now gone on record with a second prediction that a staged government terror attack will occur before the end of October unless a gargantuan effort to prevent it is launched.

Only through a massively increased counter-propaganda effort on behalf of all truth activists can prevent an imminent cataclysmic horror show that will make 9/11 look like a walk in the park.

We have exhaustively documented that criminal elements in control of major western governments have carried out terror attacks and deliberately manufactured fake alerts for political purposes.

In 2002, then White House press secretary Ari Fleischer told the Washington Times that terror alerts were issued “as a result of all the controversy that took place last week,” referring to political heat bestowed on President Bush when 9/11 prior knowledge evidence first surfaced.

From this point onwards smoking guns of government complicity in 9/11 became intrinsically linked with fake terror alerts.

In January of 2003 FBI and CIA whistleblowers told Capitol Hill Blue that the White House was scripting phony terror alerts to maintain hysteria, upkeep President Bush’s approval ratings and milk extra defense funding. The report that five Pakistani men had entered the States via Canada and were planning on carrying out a dirty bomb or biological attack was completely conjured up by the Bush administration’s black propaganda office. New York Harbor was shut down to visibly pump up the fear. One of the named suspects, Mohammed Asghar (pictured left), was tracked down to Pakistan by the Associated Press. He was a fat guy running a jewellers shop and had never even been to America.

World Net Daily commented,

“Other sources within the bureau and the Central Intelligence Agency said the administration is pressuring intelligence agencies to develop “something, anything” to support an array of non-specific terrorism alerts issued by the White House and the Department of Homeland Security…CHB reported that FBI and CIA sources said a recent White House memo listing the war on terrorism as a definitive political advantage and fund-raising tool is just one of many documents discussing how to best utilize the terrorist threat.”

Since those early admissions, every single major terror alert that the US, UK or Canadian government has issued has proven to be completely fraudulent and scripted.

Two months ago this website, in an article entitled ‘Nexus Points Emerge For Potential Summer Attack,’ predicted that, “Numerous nexus points have emerged that suggest major western governments are preparing for a summer terror attack that will come close to but not match 9/11 in scale and will provide the justification needed for an air strike on Iran before the midterm elections in early November.”

Developments today indicate that the governments of the US and the UK are engaging in a process of announcing the prevention of numerous terror plots, in order to prepare the groundwork for a real attack, under protest that they did all they could to defend the people, but that one attack slipped through.

Arrests in the US, the UK and Canada of supposed terror cells that in each case turn out to be low grade morons, victims of government entrapment, or outright fabricated evidence, are part of this conditioning process.

We have provided links to all our investigations of these staged terror alerts and more at the end of this article.

Watershed leaps in the public profile of the 9/11 truth movement directly correlate to the staging of scripted terror alerts. Each time a new national poll is released showing more people questioning the official story of 9/11, a terror alert or a high profile terror arrest is announced. Last time around it was the arrest of Al-Zarqawi – now it’s a re-hash of Operation Bojinka – a plot masterminded by admitted US government agent Ramzi Youssef.

The ramifications for the freedoms of all westerners and the very lives of thousands of Iranians and Syrians, as well as US troops, are too grave to even contemplate.

We must be more vigilant that ever before in an more vocal in our efforts to educate the world about who benefits from terror and where the weight of evidence points towards.

——————————————

Seven Morons In A Warehouse

Sears Tower: US Government Creates Another Al-Qaeda Cell

Cooked Canary Wharf Terror Plot Recycled

Canadian ‘Terror Plot’ Begins To Unravel

Hyped Terror Raid Proves To Be Paper Tiger

Toledo Terrorists and Government Entrapment

Twenty-Three Intel Experts Say LA Terror Plot a Sham

Bush Plays Terror Card With Bogus LA Attack Plot

NYC Subway “Plot”: Just Another Fake Terror Alert

ALSO SEE: FAKE TERROR ALERTS ARCHIVE

[…]

Whatever happens next, whatever attack, outrage or horror, you must refuse to react. You must refuse to accept it. No matter what they do, and no matter who ‘they’ are, no reaction must be made of any kind.

The only way that ‘world war three’ will be able to commence is if YOU allow it. That means going along in word, spirit or deed with a reaction to any event.

The people behind all of this, no matter who they are, will die either physically or politically. This means that their agenda will inevitably die with them. If we can hold on until that time, without offering reaction to any provocation, not matter how outrageous, we will survive with our culture intact.

If we fail to withdraw from this charade, this ‘drama’:

we can kiss everything we have loved good bye.

Full size image

“Don’t let it get above 4.7”

Full size image

“Are you now, or have you ever been?”

Full size image

“Avoid the 714 and the 2236”

Full size image

“What is that buzzing?”

Full size image

“Thats enough.”

Full size image

“The theatre of noise is proof of our potential”

Full size image

“Be Happy”.

Tip of the hat to ‘Matt Coggan’.

http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/8287

“Power is very rarely limited to the pure exercise of brute force…. The Roman state bolstered its authority and legitimacy with the trappings of ceremonial – cloaking the actualities of power beneath a display of wealth, the sanction of tradition, and the spectacle of insuperable resources….Power is a far more complex and mysterious quality than any apparently simple manifestation of it would appear. It is as much a matter of impression, of theatre, of persuading those over whom authority is wielded to collude in their subjugation. Insofar as power is a matter of presentation, its cultural currency in antiquity (and still today) was the creation, manipulation, and display of images.”

Jás Elsner in his recent book Imperial Rome and Christian Triumph

‘Anti-terror style “control orders” could be used to disrupt the activities of the gangsters at the top of organised crime, the government says.’

‘The government brought in control orders to target terror suspects who could not be prosecuted in courts. Control orders allow terror suspects to be tagged, confined to their homes and banned from communicating with others.’

(In other words, without a trial, they can tag you and put you under house arrest, and no communicating means no visitors, no mail, no phones, landline or mobile, and no internet access). First it was terrorists, now gangsters, what next?

Note further: ‘The plans also include introducing new laws to target people on the periphery of criminal activity and moves to increase the amount of data sharing between public sector agencies.’

Right, so they’ll be able to extend these to people they allege might be involved, and severely reducing the protections under the Data Protection Act.

Big Brother or what? Doesn’t this sound a little like a fascist or communist dictatorship? Hitler? Mussolini? Idi Amin? Saddam Hussein? Stalin? Nicolae Ceau?escu?

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictator
“In modern usage, dictator refers to an absolutist or autocratic ruler who governs outside the constitutionally normal rule of law with checks and balances, usually through a continued state of exception. However, unlike the original Roman dictators (who were a constitutional institution), modern dictators rarely give themselves the title “dictator”; it is generally used by their opponents as a pejorative term for totalitarian rule, just like despot and tyrant (also unlike their counterparts in Antiquity). “

At least some have wit. For example, Idi Amin Dada, who had been a British army lieutenant prior to Uganda’s independence from Britain in October 1962, subsequently styled himself as “His Excellency President for Life Field Marshal Al Hadji Dr. Idi Amin, VC, DSO, MC, King of Scotland Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Sea and Conqueror of the British Empire in Africa in General and Uganda in Particular.”

Oh, and the Crown Prosecution Service have decided not to prosecute any police officers over the killing of the Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes on London’s Underground (metro), but will prosecute the police in general under the 1974 Health and Safety at Work Act for “failing to provide for the health, safety and welfare” of Mr Menezes on 22 July.

So they can shoot you now to and get away with it.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5187752.stm

[…]

Snarfed from a thread on Digg.

“That compliance is what scares me the most. People are resigned to their fate. They’ve bought the Government’s arguments for the public good. There is a generational failure of memory about individual rights. Whenever Government says that some intrusion is necessary in the public interest, an entire generation has no clue how to respond, not even intuitively And that is the great lesson that other countries must learn. The US must never lose sight of its traditions of individual freedom.” ^Independent

Thankns to the mighty Jultra for pointing this out.

Anyone reading Irdial-List and BLOGDIAL will know that I have been saying for many years that the current ‘whatever’ generation is the most spineless, useless bunch of subhuman Eloi man has ever produced. Now even the mainstream media understands this.

We have a big problem.

As long as these apathetics (like the ones you see in Zardoz who unable even to speak) remain inert, Mass Murderer Bliar and Bogus Brown his evil apprentice and sucessor are going to be able to get away with things we cannot even imagine.

There are still enough of us around to change everything permanently, after all, it only took a handful of people to lead the UK into an illegal and devastating war of colonization, 100,000 defiants could ‘fix the problem’ in a matter of one week.

And finally from Jultra, classic words of pure wisdom:

It’s funny really isn’t it ? We don’t let former pedophiles work in schools with kids, but we put (former-) communists into goverment.

!!!!!!!

Its true! These monsters were the enemy, and now they control everything, and are rolling out Soviet style measures right in our faces, and we are surprised.

Once again however, it is only because the apathetics are gaining numbers (or at least, they are the ones standing still so that they can be counted) that this is at all possible.

Update

It has to be said also, that these newspapers that decry the uselessness of this generation are the same ones that print the government line time and time again without comment. They never spell out what this generation of lusers should think about themselvs and why, they simply say, “they are all wrong”. Perhaps the independent should:

• Counter every single PR driven article by marking where PR is the primary source.
• Counter every government pronouncement with an unambiguous explanation as to why it is wrong (if it is wrong), and the action to be taken to defeat the pronounced measure.
• Educate. If these Eloi-ish cretins dont know anything, then they need to be TAUGHT.

The above should replace the fanciful front pages that they are so keen on printing in a vain attempt to differentiate themselvs from the other PR pumping rags on the shelvs.

Control orders are part of the anti-terrorism effort

The UK faces an emerging constitutional crisis after a judge quashed a key plank of the government’s anti-terror laws, a leading Labour MP has said. John Denham, chairman of the Commons home affairs committee, said judges were engaged in a battle with the elected Parliament.

It comes after the High Court said control orders, used to restrain terror suspects, broke human rights laws.

Ministers will challenge the ruling in the Court of Appeal next week.[…]

Home Office Minister Tony McNulty said the government would try to overturn the ruling in the Court of Appeal.

“We do really seriously feel that the interest of public safety far outweighs the rights of particular individuals who are incredibly dangerous but there’s not that evidential base there.” […]

We watched Sin City recently, and I am reminded of something from that film, a quote from ‘Senator Raorke’: Power comes from lying. Lying big, and gettin’ the whole damn world to play along with you. Once you got everybody agreeing with what they know in their hearts ain’t true, you’ve got ’em by the balls.

At least some of our judges are doing what they can.
Someone clever said:
‘Don’t concentrate on the finger, or you will miss all the heavenly glory!’

Sub Sub anyone?

Indeed, Cameron and the Tories should be deeply truly ashamed. This is the time to be fighting for what you believe in, not in what you don’t believe in and making the suffering of the UK immeasurably worse in the process.

What is ironic is that Labour already know they are in massive trouble, an article today in the Guardian entitled ‘Brown aide: we will lose next election’ says it all, and while this is very much Gordon Brown trying to speed up his smooth transition and rally his supporters, it’s also actually true:

“At a fringe meeting during a weekend conference organised by Compass, a leftwing pressure group, Mr Wills claimed that at the last election “every single Labour MP on the doorstep reported profound disillusionment and disengagement. We scraped through. If 14,000 Labour voters had voted Tory in May 2005, we would have been in a hung parliament. That is all it took – that is how narrow it was” ^Guardian

[…]

http://jultra.blogspot.com

I was just about to write about this article. These lines grabbed my attention:

He continued: ” We have got good messages and we are delivering on public services so why is it they don’t listen any more? It is because they don’t trust us. Iraq is an important part of that. The presidential style of the prime minister – which brought us great dividends in the early years and now we are seeing the mirror image of that – is also part of it.”

He added: “Unless we can get people to start listening to us, unless they are prepared to hear the messages we are putting across, we are going to lose next time. There is no question about it.” […]

This is another example of the completely delusional mindset insde fascist labour.

You freakish upside down circus clown; it is not the people who have to listen to these ‘good messages’, it is YOU, neu labour imbeciles, who have to listen to the demands of the electorate, and then OBEY. YOU are the servants; it is for YOU to take heed and do as you we bid you do.

Nothing less than a complete undoing of all the bad legislaton that has been passed, the dismantling of the bogus new adminstrations that have been formed will do. Failing this, it is clear that they (and anyone even tangentially associated with them) should NEVER be trusted again, for ANY reason, and we must (if we are thinking along these lines for the sake of argument) get someone in who will pull everything back to where it should be, removing all the anti-democratic, illiberal shit that bliar and co have spread over this land.

Sadly, for them, there is no way that they can undo the mass murder that they were directly responsible for. The best they can do is humble themselvs before the world, turn over Bliar and his murderous cabinet to Den Hague on war crimes charges as a sacrifice to cleanse the responsibilty of Great Britain and its people for the ongoing atrocities that are being committed in this great nations name.

I found that piece in the Guardian breathtaking in its paralell universe outlook; these people really do inhabit a fantasy world totaly disconected from the real world and real people. They must only associate with their own type, and speak to members of the public only when they are conducting polls, otherwise, how is it possible that they can misunderstand the public mood so profoundly?