Archive for March, 2006

The way BBQ should spread our content

Wednesday, March 15th, 2006

With Bittorrent of course. Licence payers should not have to pay AGAIN for programmes they have already funded through the licence. As for people with IPs outside of the UK, our culture and content is the best ambassador Britain could possibly have, and measured against what it costs each licence payer, cheap.

magic number at BBQ

Wednesday, March 15th, 2006

While most media organisations are cutting back frantically to compete with the internet, the BBC is demanding “inflation plus two and a half per cent” from the government to prop up its ratings. The claim is absurd. The licence fee already yields a stunning £3bn. The BBC recently said it could lose 3,700 staff with no loss of broadcast quality; so who hired these useless people? The BBC bureaucracy is the common agricultural policy of the air, filling silos with overheads to cushion its eventual collapse into one gigantic pension fund. Come the digital revolution in a few years, the Cotswolds will be settled entirely by wealthy BBC pensioners all listening to Classic FM.

Simon Jenkins

Who would have thunk it? A supremely great paragraph methinks, “the CAP of the air” wonderful.

Relatedly it seems that the BBQ is thinking of localising it’s free online content, now it would seem perfectly reasonable to give UK resident’s the choice of accessing online content via the license fee or on the same terms as overseas browsers – in fact any system that doesn’t introduce a BBQ tax on the sale of computers or broadband connections

The BBC is set to begin commercialising traffic to bbc.co.uk, two strategies the company is considering are charging overseas users to access the site, and running commercials on the site. David Moody, director of strategy ad new media at BBC Worldwide has asserted that “Now is the right time to look at commercialising international traffic to bbc.co.uk.”

The BBC has also used the services of consulting firm Accenture to investigate ways to “make money from people who use its services but don’t pay the license fee.”

Mr. Moody has hinted that even license fee payers may have to pay an extra fee for certain types of online content, for example they might have to pay to view video material after the expiry of the current seven day window period offered by the online interactive media player.

http://www.editorsweblog.org/news/2006/03/bbc_may_charge_for_web_access.php

Sketch on passports

Tuesday, March 14th, 2006

I started to draft this back in the day and ran out of steam:

What is a passport anyway?
It says that to officials of another country that you are afforded legal protection in a foreign country by the country of issue.
In which case the idea of a passport as a prerequisite for travel is unsound (there is no obligation to buy travel insurance when going abroad, so why should one be required to have the ‘insurance’ of the State when going abroad?
Certainly when travelling within the EU where legal frameworks are almost homogenous anyway.)

The truth is that the mass British Passport has always been an identity document:

The modern passport system really began at the time of the First World War, when states began to issue passports as a way of distinguishing their own citizens from those they saw as foreign nationals.

The British Nationality and Status Aliens Act 1914 was part of this process.

—————————-


History of British Nationality Law

The UN charter relating to stateless persons

… The personal status of a stateless person shall be governed by the law of the country of his domicile or, if he has no domicile, by the law of the country of his residence…

…Article 27. – Identity papers

The Contracting States shall issue identity papers to any stateless person in their territory who does not possess a valid travel document.
Article 28. – Travel documents

The Contracting States shall issue to stateless persons lawfully staying in their territory travel documents for the purpose of travel outside their territory, unless compelling reasons of national security or public order otherwise require, and the provisions of the schedule to this Convention shall apply with respect to such documents. The Contracting States may issue such a travel document to any other stateless person in their territory; they shall in particular give sympathetic consideration to the issue of such a travel document to stateless persons in their territory who are unable to obtain a travel document from the country of their lawful residence…

Alternatives to a slave passport

Tuesday, March 14th, 2006

Way back (in internet time) when we took a look at an alternative to your state issued passport. Lets look again at it:

Passport Cover

THE
WORLD
PASSPORT

The World Passport is a 30 page document printed in 7 languages: English, French, Spanish, Russian, Arabic, Chinese and Esperanto. Each passport is numbered and each page contains the World Citizen logo as background. Two pages are reserved for affiliate identifications: diplomatic corps, organizations, firms, etc. There are nineteen visa pages. In the inside back cover, there is space for home address, next of kin, doctor, employer, driving license no. and national passport/identity number. The cover is blue with gold lettering.Go to World Passport Application Form


The World Passport represents the inalienable human right of freedom of travel on planet Earth. Therefore it is premised on the fundamental oneness or unity of the human community.In modern times, the passport has become a symbol of national sovereignty and control by each nation-state. That control works both for citizens within a nation and all others outside. All nations thus collude in the system of control of travel rather than its freedom. If freedom of travel is one of the essential marks of the liberated human being, as stated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, then the very acceptance of a national passport is the mark of the slave, serf or subject. The World Passport is therefore a meaningful symbol and sometimes powerful tool for the implementation of the fundamental human right of freedom of travel. By its very existence it challenges the exclusive assumption of sovereignty of the nation-state system. It is designed however to conform to nation-state requirements for travel documents. It does not, however, indicate the nationality of its bearer, only his/her birthplace. It is therefore a neutral, apolitical document of identity and potential travel document.A passport gains credibility only by its acceptance by authorities other than the issuing agent. The World Passport in this respect has a track record of over 50 years acceptance since it was first issued. Today over 150 countries have visaed it on a case-by-case basis. In short, the World Passport represents the one world we all live in and on. No one has the right to tell you you can’t move freely on your natural birthplace! So don’t leave home without one! […]

http://www.worldgovernment.org/docpass.html

So, you can get one of these passports, and then keep it and your expired British passport together when you travel. You leave the UK on your Expired British passport, enter your destination on your World Wassport, and then re-enter the UK on your expired British passport, since they cannot refuse you entry to Britain just because your passport is expired.

OR can they?

Is there a rule saying that you cannot leave the UK on an expired British passport? I know people who have left the UK on expired foreign passports (and then even entered the countries that they were going to on expired passports), so we would have to google that.

Then there is the possibility of getting a passport from another nation. It is presumed that this is harder to do, since normally you have to be a citizen of a country to get its passport. A quick google throws up:

How You Can Have a Second Passport, New Residency & Global Freedom
By Catherine Jones.

Why deal with one nation on its terms; when you can deal with all nations on your terms?

As things continue to deteriorate inside the United States
having a second passport becomes more and more of a priority

The loss of civil liberties in the USA has become chronic – the growing censorship, a stark warning.
Rational people having taken notice – those with their heads in the sand must bury them deeper to block out the obvious.

A new e-book by Catherine Jones – This is the only e-book that will get you a second passport; without the hype, the rip off, the B.S. and the run-around common to most books on this subject. This e-book will also show you how to get residency, work permits, retirement residency, and student visas in every region of the world. Twenty seven nations covered – 241 pages of rock solid facts.

How Do We Get A Second Passport?
This e-book supplies the answers, the methods and the requirements, (the majority of which are not commonly known,) for getting a second passport. This e-book can get you into the EU. This e-book can help you retire in dozens of nations. This e-book covers the subject of gaining legal residency, a second passport, work permits, asylum, honorary passports, retirement visas, and a great deal more, it provides the real facts and the real solutions, which sets this e-book apart from anything else in its category. This is neither a dream book, nor a book about vague ” under the table ” deals; it is an e-book about what it takes to get new residency, a second citizenship and a legal second passport. In fact.

The information complied by the author has never before existed in a unified form. This e-book is a first. The data was all but impossible to compile, even on a case by case basis, as for the most part none of it was posted or publicly available. It had to be extracted, like an elephant’s molar, from each separate government, and then the precise agency within that government, always at great effort; and only after the correct government agency could be found. The immigration offices, their systems and their requirements for conveying information differed absolutely in every nation that was contacted. It was like trying to find a needle in an infinite number of haystacks. […]

http://www.escapeartist.com/

and this, from a firm of specialst lawyers:

Henley & Partners are recognised as the world’s leading specialists for exclusive private residence solutions. We have also built an international reputation for citizenship law of selected countries, comparative citizenship law and the acquisition of alternative citizenship. We advise on all legal possibilities and programmes currently available to acquire an alternative citizenship and to legally obtain a second passport. We give unbiased information and advice on the advantages and disadvantages of the available options. Individual clients as well as other law and consulting firms worldwide rely on us for specialised advice and assistance in this delicate area where our expertise and experience are second to none.

Alternative Citizenship and a Second Passport – Freedom to Travel and to do Business, and Security for Life.


Citizenship and Passports

Citizenship is the relationship between an individual and a sovereign State, defined by the law of that State and with corresponding duties and rights. A passport is a personal identification and travel document for international use issued by a sovereign State. Generally, only passports which are issued based on a person’s citizenship are of any interest and use. Only through the acquisition of full citizenship can you legally acquire the right to a passport. Non-citizen passports and other passports issued to Non-citizen passports and other passports issued to non-citizens are most of the time illegal and/or useless, with certain exceptions such as the Panamanian non-citizens passport issued to persons holding a retiree residence permit in Panama, or diplomatic passports issued to non-citizens, UN and refugee passports and certain other travel documents issued by international organisations or individual States. Diplomatic passports are only legal and useful if issued by the competent authorities within the issuing State or international organisation and if the holder is properly accredited in the receiving State.[…]

http://www.henleyglobal.com/m-citizenship.html

So there are ways to escape, as long as you have the will and some money. All the smart people already have more than one passport.

The Laughing Policeman

Tuesday, March 14th, 2006

Critics claim ministers are breaking an election promise that the ID scheme would be voluntary by insisting that anyone who renews a passport will also have to get an ID card and be entered on the national register.

But Mr Clarke rejected this charge last night to laughter and jeers of derision from the opposition.

“Passports are voluntary documents,” he insisted.No one is forced to renew a passport if they choose not to do so.”

Invertebrates refuse backbones.

So, from this final statement by Dumbo, I infer that there must be no legal requirement for me to have a passport in order to leave this country and return. Otherwise, once again, HMG are stating that I will be under confinement within the UK mainland unless I comply with their ‘voluntary’ ID card scheme.

A quick search on the UK Passport  Service site reveals no page detailing any legal requirement for holding a passport in order to leave the country. Hmmm… I wonder. Don’t you?

Charles Clarke: liar and monster

Tuesday, March 14th, 2006
MPs back identity card proposals

Government plans to force all passport applicants to get an identity card have been backed by MPs, overturning an earlier defeat in the House of Lords. Peers have twice defeated the plans, which they say break Labour’s election promise that the initial ID scheme would be voluntary.

But Home Secretary Charles Clarke said passports were “voluntary documents” that no-one was forced to renew.

The Identity Cards Bill will return to the House of Lords on Wednesday.

The vote, which Labour won by 310 votes to 277, sets the stage for a constitutional clash between the Commons and the Lords. […]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4803930.stm

Charles Clarke is a beast of a man. He knows you cannot travel on an expired passport. He knows that if you loose your passport, that you must replace it if you want to travel.

This is a perfect example of how ID cards will be used to control you. You are not obliged to have one, but if you refuse, you cannot open a bank account, post a package, travel on the underground with a pass, etc etc.

This is pure evil, and this statement about passports being voluntary documents just shows how evil the whole proposal is. It is based on lies at its very foundation, and lies are being used to force through its introduction.

This is why people say that democracy is broken; with monsters, murderers, liars and enslavers at the helm every single time, no one in their right mind thinks that democracy in its current form is a good thing.

NOW you see!

Monday, March 13th, 2006

So. Americans are now outraged that Murder Inc. wants to make it illegal to report that Murder Inc. is doing illegal stuff.

Someone on a forum sowhere had the AUDACITY to say:

Soon, a spew of British websites were set up to post reports Americans sent in :P

To which came the blistering reply:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,,1329858,00.html

the last time the british tried to tell the americans to get rid of bush, there was a torrent of abuse about bad teeth and mind your own fucking business you limey loosers. the brits were right of course, now you have more dead in iraq, patriot act passed again, and the further dismantling of your constitution and your democracy.

“Have you not noticed that Americans don’t give two shits what Europeans think of us? Each email someone gets from some arrogant Brit telling us why to NOT vote for George Bush is going to backfire, you stupid, yellow-toothed pansies … I don’t give a rat’s ass if our election is going to have an effect on your worthless little life. I really don’t. If you want to have a meaningful election in your crappy little island full of shitty food and yellow teeth, then maybe you should try not to sell your sovereignty out to Brussels and Berlin, dipshit. Oh, yeah – and brush your goddamned teeth, you filthy animals.
Wading River, NY”

So, dont expect the brits to come rushing to help you break the laws that you voted for in a childish fit of pique.

Every country gets the government it deserves. Britian is in the grips of a police state powergrab. We are busy. Clean up your own dogshit.

POW! POW! POW! POW! POW!

Police requests for Oyster data rises

Monday, March 13th, 2006

Oyster data use rises in crime clampdown
Staff and agencies
Monday March 13, 2006

Police hunting criminals are increasingly seeking information from electronically stored travel records, such as those created by users of the popular Oyster card in London.

Figures disclosed today show a huge leap in police requests to Transport for London, which operates the Oyster cards used to travel on buses, trains and the underground.

Just seven information requests were made by police in the whole of 2004, compared with 61 requests made in January this year alone…

http://technology.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1730002,00.html

This was bound to happen of course.

If you really want to have an Oyster card, (and TFL gives you a good reason to use one; bus fares are £1 with Oyster instead of £1.50 when you pay cash for example) you must:

  • Make sure you have an anonymous Oyster card; you can buy them for £3
  • NEVER fill your Oyster with your credit card or debit card, use only cash. If you update Oyster with a card that is connected to you, your Oyster will be connected to you via the details on the card.
  • Never use someone elses Oyster. If they are a criminal, and you use their card, the police might swipe you coming off or getting on the underground*.

*Now, the last one is not true…yet, but you can guarantee that in the future the police will have realtime access to Oyster touc-ins and touch-outs. That means that when a criminal gets onto a bus, they can tell the driver not to open the doors until they get there. The same with the trains. They can tell the driver to stay in the tunnel until they get to the next station where they can sweep the whole train.

Scotland Yard nursery rhyme no. 2

Monday, March 13th, 2006

This little piggy deployed marksmen
This little piggy should stay schtumm
This liilte piggy creates a load o’ grief
This little piggy comes undone
‘cos this little piggy taped Lord Goldsmith as they spoke on the phone

A clear view of the backlash

Monday, March 13th, 2006

President Bush is facing criticism both abroad and at home. But that doesn’t mean that the British government is going to weaken its relationship with Washington. After Britain got into the Second World War, the British people began to learn a lot about the USA. Prior to the war, Hollywood was the only American institution that people knew a great deal about.

The American government had pursued an isolationist policy for many years and so I suppose it didn’t make much sense to be deeply interested in what Washington was thinking when every day the headlines were dominated by Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin.

When information about America and the Americans started to pour out it took two forms. The first concentrated on the immense practicality of American domestic gadgetry.The second emphasised the extreme simplicity of American thought. Bear in mind, in the rush to war the British understandably took refuge in stereotypes. At that time they felt that we were surrounded by unfathomable and peculiar foreigners.

Show trials

The Germans sang sentimental songs, but were fanatically devoted to Adolf Hitler. The Russians also sang and danced as well, but they kept confessing in famous trials that they were all working for the Japanese secret service, or the Gestapo.

It was a relief for the British to turn from these odd nations to the straightforward Americans, who knew nothing of the world outside America and apparently judged everything in simple, moral terms.It was the assumed simplicity of Americans that was both appealing and reassuring. True, America had gangsters; short men in smart clothes played in movies by Jimmy Cagney and Edward G. Robinson.

But the ordinary American was a tall, shambling figure, as portrayed by Gary Cooper or Jimmy Stewart, who spoke monosyllabically and believed in telling the truth. Snide critics asserted that the ordinary American wasn’t overwhelmingly bright, but we all have our little failings. And what he lacked in intelligence he more than made up for in raw courage.

So the Americans not only reassured the British by their simple strength, they also made the British feel sophisticated.

They aroused none of the unease the French did. Listening to the French made the British feel like bumpkins. The Americans made us feel like wise uncles. We could smile at their naivety and comfort ourselves with the thought that they wouldn’t come to grief with us around to throw in a bit of Old World duplicity when needed.

Patronising

Patronising though they may have been, these feelings contributed greatly to the strength behind the Anglo-American alliance. Harold Macmillan said the British were the ancient Greeks, guiding and advising the American Rome.

Perhaps that wasn’t very tactfully put and maybe shouldn’t have been said in public at all, but it did illustrate the cement that held the alliance together.

How different from the situation this week when the American President, though nominally supported by us, is in fact cruelly isolated.

Last week President Bush made a trip to Asia, which had a strange atmosphere to the point of being weird. He turned Pakistan’s capital, Islamabad, into a kind of ghost town. The reason why could be found in a Punjabi opinion poll. 3% thought the USA was a trusted partner for Pakistan, while 60% didn’t even support the war on the Taliban and al-Qaeda.

Oblivious to opinion polls and the eerie silence, President Bush gently urged Pakistan’s President Musharraf to get his agents into al-Qaeda and bring the terrorists to justice.

He also recommended a strong dose of American style democracy for Pakistan, apparently convinced that once the government of Pakistan did what the man in the street wanted all would be well – even though the man in the street had made his feelings towards the United States clear enough by keeping the same streets empty during the President’s visit. […]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4794164.stm

The contrast between ordinary BBQ writing and the writing of invited guests or people who are allowed to write whatever they feel, like the producer of Newsnight climbing down from his ‘Bittorrent is PeadoTerror’ shill piece is astonishing.

The sound of real thought, real history clear analysis and proper context is quite refreshing is it not?

Did anyone read reports about the streets of Islamabad being empty?

Hmmmmmmmmmm!

It’s immanent!

Sunday, March 12th, 2006

‘UFO sighting really took my breath away’

By Carron Taylor

WAS it a bird? Was it a plane? No, it was a shining silver pyramid, according to two colleagues who spotted a UFO in the skies of Putney last week.

Michelle Medhat was sitting at her office desk last Wednesday morning when she glanced out of the window and spotted a glimmering silver object in the sky.

“I thought what the hell is that?’ There were no clouds in the sky at all and 100 per cent visibility.

“The sun was hitting the object and you could see it was turning very slowly.

“I did get a feeling there was something strange about the thing,” she said.

Entranced, Michelle signalled to her colleague Peter Gardiner, 53, to take a look.

He said: “At first I thought it was a big piece of rubbish or a clear tarpaulin sheet.

“But then it glistened and it was shiny. It had a strange pattern of movement. It was a significant size, possibly the size of a roof or even a house.”

The pair watched it for a couple of minutes, rotating in the distance and heading towards Wandsworth Town. Then, as soon as it had appeared it vanished.

Michelle said if it was a piece of rubbish it would have caused severe damage when it came down, because of its size and density.

“I can’t explain it and therefore I’m calling it a UFO. It took my breath away. It did feel weird.

“The more I looked at it I realised there was something not quite right. It wasn’t moving like anything I’ve ever seen before,” she said.

A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence (MoD) said it had not been notified of any sighting of the pyramid.

“The MoD does not have any expertise or role in respect of UFO/flying saucer’ matters or to the question of the existence or otherwise of extraterrestrial lifeforms, about which it remains totally open-minded.”

He said it examined the reports of UFO sightings it received solely to establish whether what was seen might have some defence significance, namely whether there was any evidence the UK’s airspace might have been compromised by hostile or unauthorised air activity.

Michelle and Peter said there has been a lot of activity in the skies over Putney recently.

Michelle said they had seen several Chinook helicopters over the past week and believes something must be happening.

Chinooks are used to transport troops, artillery, supplies and equipment, but also used for operations such as medical evacuation, disaster relief and search and rescue.

When travelling to Putney, our reporter saw what looked to be three Apache helicopters travelling east.

A spokesman for the MoD said the helicopters were probably part of general aviation traffic over London and there was no specific activity or event they were involved in. He added such movements were “not unusual”.

Did you see the flying silver pyramid? Call the newsdesk on 020 8254 5409.

ctaylor@london.newsquest.co.uk

[…]
This is London Local

Chinooks are flying over that part of London regularly. They make a very distinctive sound, and you can tell they are coming when they are miles away.

As for this pyramid account, well, when I saw that logo above whilst trawling around (as one does) I just couldnt resist!

The government that governs best, governs least

Sunday, March 12th, 2006

Further information: freedom of movement, and ka-tzetnik, and propiska, Economic and social liberals have a generally negative attitude towards identity cards on the principle that if society already works adequately without them, they should not be imposed by government, on the principle that “the government that governs best, governs least”. Some opponents have pointed out that extensive lobbying for identity cards has been undertaken, in countries without compulsory identity cards, by IT companies who will be likely to reap rich rewards in the event of an identity card scheme being implemented.

Very often, opposition to identity cards is born out of the suspicion that they will be used to track anyone’s movements and private life, possibly endangering one’s privacy; for instance, a person will probably not want others to know he or she is attending meetings with Alcoholics Anonymous. In countries currently using identity cards, there is no mechanism for this. However the proposed British ID card will involve a series of linked databases, to be managed by the private sector. Managing disparate linked systems with a range of institutions and any number of personnel having access to them is a potential security disaster in the making.[1]

Opponents have also argued that some nations require the card to be carried at all times. This is not necessarily impractical, as an ID is no more cumbersome than a credit card. However, opponents point out that a requirement to carry an identity card at all times can lead to arbitrary requests from card controllers (such as the police). Even where there is no legal requirement to carry the card, functionality creep could lead to de facto compulsion to carry.

Some opponents make comparisons with totalitarian governments, which issued identity cards to their populations, and used them oppressively.

[…]

France

France has had a French national identity card since 1940, when it helped the Vichy autorities identify 76,000 for deportation as part of the Holocaust.

In the past, identity cards were compulsory, had to be updated each year in case of change of residence and were valid for 10 years, and its renewal required paying a tax. In addition to the face protograph, it included the family name, first names, date and place of birth, and the national identity number managed by the national INSEE registry, and which is also used as the national service registration number, as the Social Security account number for health and retirement benefits, for the access to the personal judiciary case, for taxes declarations.

Later, the laws were changed so that any official and certified document (even if expired and possibly unusable abroad) with a photograph and a name, issued by a public administration (or enterprise, such as railroad transportation cards, or student cards issued) can be used to prove one’s identity (such as the European driver’s licence, a passport, …). Also, controls of identy by the law enforcement forces (police, gendarmerie) can now accept copies of these documents, provided that the original is presented within two weeks. Any of these documents must be treated equally to proove one’s identity when accepting payments by checks, issuing a new credit (however credit cardsare now much more common and do not require such additional proof, as all French credit cards issued by banks include a processor requiring a four-digit code, the magnetic tape being almost never used).

The current identity cards are now issued free of charge, and non-compulsory. Legislation has been published for a proposed compulsory biometric card system, which has been widely criticised, including by the “National commission for computing and liberties” (Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés, CNIL), the national authority and regulator on computing systems and databases. Identity cards issued since 2004 now includes biometric information (a digitized fingerprint record, a numerically scanned photograph and a scanned signature) and various anti-fraud systems embedded within the plastic-covered card.

The next generation of the French green card, named “Carte Vitale”, for the Social Security benefit (which already includes a chip and a magnetic tape with currently very few information) will include a numeric photograph and other personal medical information in addition to identity elements. It may then become a substitute for the National identity card.

[…]

United States

Main article: Identity documents in the United States

There is no true national identity card in the United States of America, in the sense that there is no federal agency with nationwide jurisdiction that directly issues such cards to all American citizens. All legislative attempts to create one have failed due to tenacious opposition from libertarian and conservative politicians, who regard the national identity card as the mark of a totalitarian society. Driver’s licenses issued by the various states (along with special cards issued to non-drivers) are often used in lieu of a national identification card and are often required for boarding airline flights or entering office buildings. Recent (2005) federal legislation that tightened requirements for issuance of driver’s licenses has been seen by both supporters and critics as bringing the United States much closer to a de facto national identity card system.

[…]

Hong Kong

See also Hong Kong Permanent Identity Cards

Hong Kong has a long history of identity document, from paper document to recently smart card. It has not yet aroused much controversy from its first issue.

Compulsory identity document was first issued in 1949, the year the establishment of People’s Republic of China. The issue of identity documents was to halt large influx of refugees and control the border from mainland China to then-British colony Hong Kong. The exercise was completed in 1951. Although the registration was compulsory, it was not required to bring the document in public area.

The identity document was replaced by a typed identity card with fingerprint, photograph and stamp from 1960. Another replacement was taken in 1973 and new card was with photograph but no fingerprint. Stamp colour was to identify permanent residents from non-permanent.

From 24th October, 1980, it is compulsory to take the identity card in public area and produce it to a policeman when asked. This law was to halt waves of illegal immigrant to the city.

In 1983, the issue of identity card was digitalised to reduce forgery and from 2003 a smartcard embedded identity card replaced the old digital cards.

The issues of card is in general giving more desire effects than harms. It helps to reduce the crime rates in the region and provide fast access to mainland China and Macau.

[…]

Others

According to Privacy International, as of 1996, around 100 countries had compulsory identity cards. They also stated that “virtually no common law country has a card”.

For the people of Western Sahara, pre-1975 Spanish cards are the main proof that they were Saharaui citizens as opposed to recent Moroccan colonists. They would be thus allowed to vote in an eventual self-determination referendum.

Some Basque nationalist organizations are issuing para-official identity cards (Euskal Nortasun Agiria) as a means to reject the nationality notions implied by Spanish and French compulsory documents. Then, they try to use the ENA instead of the official document.

[…]

Countries with compulsory identity cards

Note: the term “compulsory” may have different meanings and implications in different countries. Often, a ticket can be given for being found without one’s identification document, or in some cases a person may even be detained until the identity is ascertained. In practice, random controls are rare, except in police states.

  • Argentina: Documento Nacional de Identidad. Issued at birth. Updated at 8 and 16 years old. Small booklet, dark green cardboard cover. The first page states the name, date and place of birth, along with a picture and right thumb print. It’s a hand written form, and the newer models have a adhesive laminate for the first page. Next pages issue address changes, wish to donate organs, military service, and vote log. Half of the pages have the DNI (a unique number), perforated through the first half of the book. Prior to DNI was the Libreta Civica (“Civic booklet”), for women, and the Libreta de Enrolamiento (“Enrollment Booklet”), for men. A few years ago there was a big scandal with the electronic DNIs that were going to be manufactured by Siemens, and it was decided that no private corporation could control the issuing of national identity. The federal police also have an identity that is valid sometimes instead of the DNI, which many people prefer to carry because after the loss of DNI there is a long process (caused only by bureaucratic reasons) in which the person is limited in some situations which require the DNI. Random controls cannot be made without a judge’s order, except in situations such as military border checkpoints.
  • Belgium: State Registry (in Dutch, French and German) (first issued at age 12, compulsory at 15)
  • Brazil: Carteira de Identidade. Compulsory to be issued and carried since the age of 18. It’s usually issued by each state’s Public Safety Secretary, or sometimes by the Armed Forces. There is a national standard, but each state can include minor differences. The front has a picture, right thumb print and signature. The verse has the unique number (RG, registro geral), expedition date, name of the person, name of the parents, place and date of birth, and other info. It’s green and plastified, officially 102 × 68 mm[3], but the lamination tends to make it slightly larger than the ISO 7810 ID-2 standard of 105 × 74 mm, resulting in a tight fit in most wallets. Only recently the driver’s licence received the same legal status of an identity card in Brazil. There are also a few other documents, such as cards issued by the national councils of some professions, which are considered equivalent to the national identity card for most purposes.
  • Chile: (Carnet de identidad; First issued at age 2 or 3, compulsory at 18)
  • China(mainland):(First issued at school age, compulsory at 16)
  • China(Hong Kong SAR) : Immigration Department (Children are required to obtain their first identity card at age 11, and must change to an adult identity card at age 18)
  • Estonia: id.ee (in Estonian), [4] (in English)
  • Germany: Personalausweis (in German) It is compulsory at age 16 to possess either a “Personalausweis” or a passport, but not to carry it. While police officers and some other officials have a right to demand to see one of those documents, the law does not state that you are obliged to submit the document at that very moment, but that you have to be able to submit it at all (bring it to the police station/municipal office the next day, or know where it is and can show it to the police at your home, etc.) You may only be fined if you do not possess an identity card or passport at all, if your document is expired or if you EXPLICITLY REFUSE to show ID to the police.
  • Indonesia: Kartu Tanda Penduduk (KTP)
  • Israel: Teudat Zehut (first issued at age 16, compulsory at 18)
  • Italy: Carta d’Identità
  • Hungary: [5] (in Hungarian) It is compulsory to possess and carry either an ID card or a passport from the age of 14. A driving license can be also used for identification from the age of 17.
  • Madagascar: Kara-panondrom-pirenen’ny teratany malagasy (Carte nationale d’identité de citoyen malagasy). Possession is compulsory for Malagasy citizens from age 18 (by decree 78-277, 1978-10-03).
  • Malaysia: MyKad. Issued at age 12 and updated at 18.
  • Netherlands: Ministry of Justice and Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations While it is not compulsory to possess an identity card, every person over 14 years of age must always carry, and be able to submit, identification (i.e., an identity card, passport, driver’s licence or aliens’ document).
  • Poland: Dowód osobisty (compulsory at 18) The relative law is roughly similar to German one.
  • Portugal: Bilhete de Identidade (compulsory at 10, can be issued before if needed)
  • Romania: Carte de identitate (compulsory at 14)
  • Singapore: National Registration Identity Card. It is compulsory for all citizens and permanent residents to apply for the card from age 15 onwards, and to re-register their cards for a replacement at age 30. It is not compulsory for bearers to hold the card at all times, nor are they compelled by law to show their cards to police officers conducting regular screening while on patrol, for instance. Failure to show any form of identification, however, may allow the police to detain suspicious individuals until relevant identification may be produced subsequently either in person or by proxy. The NRIC is also a required document for some government procedures, commercial transactions such as the opening of a bank account, or to gain entry to premises by surrendering or exchanging for an entry pass. Failure to produce the card may result in denied access to these premises or attainment of goods and services. Immigration & Checkpoints Authority
  • Slovenia: Osebna izkaznica compulsory at 18, can be issued to citizens under 18 on request by their parent or legal guardian.
  • Spain: Documento Nacional de Identidad (DNI) compulsory at 14, can be issued before if necessary (to travel to other European countries, for example). It is to be replaced by Electronic DNI.

Also Croatia, Egypt, Greece, Luxembourg, Portugal and Thailand.

Countries with non-compulsory identity cards or no identity cards

Austria, Canada (“Certificate of Canadian Citizenship”), Finland, France, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland have non-compulsory identity cards.

  • Sweden has recently started issuing national identity cards, but they are by no means compulsory. Most Swedes have not even seen one. Commonly people use their driving licences as ID, or a ID issued by banks or the post. Some big companies and authoritys also issue ID cards to their employees which are usually accepted inside Sweden as identification.

Denmark, Norway, the United States, the Republic of Ireland and Iceland have no official national identity cards.

Note: As noted above, certain countries do not have national ID cards, but have other official documents that play the same role in practice (e.g. driver’s license for the United States). While a country may not make it de jure compulsory to own or carry an identity document, it may be de facto strongly recommended to do so in order to facilitate certain procedures.

[…]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ID_Card

Look into my iris for rollcall

Saturday, March 11th, 2006
By Hannah Edwards
March 12, 2006

EYE-SCANNING cameras may replace rollcall at NSW schools if a trial of the high-tech machines is successful.The iris-recognition cameras, similar to those used in jails and airports, are being trialled in three NSW schools.

They have already been installed at Lidcombe TAFE, where students entering the high-security photonics laboratory are required to look into the cameras to be allowed into the laboratory.

Schools have shown interest in using the scanners to record student attendance, taking the roll in the morning and monitoring truancy.

A camera in the device photographs the iris; the photo data is transmitted to a central database to find a match.

The security company conducting the trials, Argus Solutions, says the technology is more advanced and accurate than DNA matching.

“It’s not invasive and is non-threatening,” chief executive Bruce Lyman said.

“The cameras are set up at a point in the school that is as close to the front gate as possible. Students scan at the beginning of the day and at the end of the day.”

For a school of 1000 students, the average cost of using the technology is about $5 a student a term.

The technology is already entrenched at schools in Britain, Mr Lyman said.

Parents’ reaction to the new technology was expected to be mixed, the Council of Catholic School Parents’ executive director Danielle Cronin said.

“It’s great for security,” Ms Cronin said. “The flipside is that there are issues of privacy and dignity with the children being passed through gates like cattle.”

[…]

http://www.smh.com.au/news/

My emphasis.

“It’s not that you’re stupid; you know all of the porno stars.”

Friday, March 10th, 2006

One to watch:

http://www.infowarsmedia.com/video/shows/030106_camps_free_30min_bb.mov

Alex Jones right on target, and ‘on fire’.

A link from this broadcast:

10-Year U.S. Strategic Plan For Detention Camps Revives Proposals From Oliver North

News Analysis/Commentary, Peter Dale Scott,
New America Media, Feb 21, 2006

Editor’s Note: A recently announced contract for a Halliburton subsidiary to build immigrant detention facilities is part of a longer-term Homeland Security plan titled ENDGAME, which sets as its goal the removal of “all removable aliens” and “potential terrorists.” Scott is author of “Drugs, Oil, and War: The United States in Afghanistan, Colombia, and Indochina” (Rowman & Littlefield, 2003). He is completing a book on “The Road to 9/11.” Visit his Web site at http://www.peterdalescott.net.
Detainee at fence
The Halliburton subsidiary KBR (formerly Brown and Root) announced on Jan. 24 that it had been awarded a $385 million contingency contract by the Department of Homeland Security to build detention camps. Two weeks later, on Feb. 6, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff announced that the Fiscal Year 2007 federal budget would allocate over $400 million to add 6,700 additional detention beds (an increase of 32 percent over 2006). This $400 million allocation is more than a four-fold increase over the FY 2006 budget, which provided only $90 million for the same purpose.

Both the contract and the budget allocation are in partial fulfillment of an ambitious 10-year Homeland Security strategic plan, code-named ENDGAME, authorized in 2003. According to a 49-page Homeland Security document on the plan, ENDGAME expands “a mission first articulated in the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798.” Its goal is the capability to “remove all removable aliens,” including “illegal economic migrants, aliens who have committed criminal acts, asylum-seekers (required to be retained by law) or potential terrorists.” […]

http://news.pacificnews.org/

More ‘pat on the head’ tech writing at BBQ

Friday, March 10th, 2006

A BBQ misleader says:

Media are becoming democratised, and a global conversation is emerging.

Note how the word ‘democracy’ is used in this context; as a force for good, shifting power from the center to the masses.

This is of course, totally wrong.

Media are becoming Anarchized. Democracy is second tier to very epitome of centralized power, the dictatorship; what is happening on the web is that anyone can do whatever they like, without any group consensus or control. That is Anarchy, not Democracy, and it’s a good thing.

There is no ‘global conversation’ this is just new labour doubletalk.

The democratisation of media is also, fundamentally, about the people we once called mere consumers. Their role is evolving from a passive one to something much more interactive, but they are blessed (or cursed, depending on one’s viewpoint) with an unprecedented variety of voices and services.

How can a thing that brings you every possible point of view be a bad thing? If you are a paternalist with access to BBQ as a platform it is a VERY bad thing, because your voice is diminished, and your words ridiculed as everyone can see that the emperor has no clothes, just as I am doing right now. Note how he says that consumers ‘role’ is evolving from passive to interactive, and not active. Interactive means consuming BBQI. It means consuming full stop. Blogging, using Google News..its all about being active. Interactive means passive. And of course, that is what these patricians want; passive consumption in another arena.

The democratisation of media creation, distribution and access does not necessarily foretell that traditional media are dinosaurs of a new variety. If we are fortunate, we’ll end up with a more diverse media ecosystem in which many forms – including the traditional organisations – can thrive.

Why would be fortunate for us? It would be fortunate for YOU because you will keep your artificially created position. It would be bad for everyone else, because we would be compelled to continue consumption of the lies spread by BBQ, as this country is turned into a mini Soviet Union, and embarks on another insane war.

For my part, the most exciting aspect of this change is in the emerging conversation.

‘For your part’ means, “please adopt my catchphrase”. No Sale.

Ill leave it to you to read the rest of it; it is contradictory to say the least. Each example he gives in a list of the “…most important tools in today’s evolving media sphere.” – blogs, wikis, podcasts, web mashups – are all things in which people are being active and not passive. People are being active by creating these resources and they are being active by turning away from BBQ as their sole source of information. Note also how he calls this the ‘evolving media sphere’ making a connection with what he is involved with ‘the media’ and what he is being superceeded by, the blogosphere, the web and software developers.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4789852.stm 

A Terrorist Spilled Cola on Me

Friday, March 10th, 2006

THE NEW TERRORISTS – ARE YOU ONE? DOWNLOAD MUSIC? BLOCK TRAFFIC? WRITE A BAD CHECK?

Posted By: Rayelan
Date: Sunday, 15 January 2006, 6:12 p.m.

The reclassification of terrorism is spreading across this country. A bill just BARELY defeated in Oregon would have made you a terrorist if you download music, block traffic or write a bad check. Want to know what the punishment would have been? Read on…

This Madness Is Spreading Nationwide!!

Excerpts from a recent interview of
Dr Walter Belford
by PT Shamrock

DWB – For instance Senate bill 742 in Oregon, which was narrowly defeated by just three votes, would have classified terrorism as a plethora of completely unrelated actions.

Downloading music, blocking traffic, writing a bad cheque or any form of protest, none of which has anything to do with terrorism. All these ‘offences’would be punishable by life in prison unless you agreed to attend a “forest labour camp” for 25 years of enforced labour.

I understand that a made over version of Senate bill 742 will be reintroduced in late 2006 with another name and with some minor adjustments and will probably pass the second time around. Then it will naturally, spread nationwide.

Not even Communist China or Stalinist North Korea put people in labour camps for writing a bad cheque, but this was nearly implemented in the ‘land of the free’. Debtor’s prisons were supposed to have been banned more than 150 years ago! Explain to me what does writing a cheque with insufficient funds have to do with fighting terrorism? Nothing I tell you, absolutely nothing!

Understand and know that this was an actual bill and there are similar ones around the nation that are also being drawn up by your so-called representatives in government.

DWB – If you think Oregon is bad, try Wisconsin! Wisconsin is crazy about control. It takes fingerprints when a police officer pulls you over for a broken taillight. And blood specimens if they suspect you are intoxicated or on drugs. Wisconsin has the honour of sponsoring the Super National ID legislation which will also be a Pan American Union Card, i.e. an international ID as the US merges with Canada and Mexico.

PTS – What else is Wisconsin infamous for?

DWB – A man was sent to prison for five years for “paper terrorism.” He sent too many papers in a complaint he had with the government.

DWB continues – In Rhode Island, governors proposed a bill that would have outlawed criticism of the government, defining it as anarchy under World War One era rhetoric.

In the UK there is a very active advert campaign presently that encourages anyone to report “any suspicious” behavior from their neighbors, etc. to the authorities. What “suspicious” means is left entirely up to the person who would report someone. So if you had a neighbor that was angry with you for any real or imagined reason, you’d be reported and your name will remain on numerous government databases forever! Your name will never be deleted from those government databases.

Couldn’t find the “real” article and don’t really have time to find all the dates/actual instances of all the mentioned things in this article, but it really is quite ridiculous… I wonder if one day not paying a parking meter will land me in a forced labour camp (because, after all, parking fees are all about private property, which is the most important thing of all…).

Documents From the US Espionage Den

Thursday, March 9th, 2006

>>> “Documents From the US Espionage Den” is a legendary series of Iranian books containing classified US documents that were found in the American Embassy in Tehran when it was taken over by revolutionaries. These books are very hard to come by in the US, and until now there has been no concerted effort to post them. The National Security Archive is integrating individual documents into their electronic reading books on various topics, but we’re interested in posting the whole set, volume by volume. As a first step, we’re offering a smattering of the documents via the files above. We beseech anyone with access to the books – either the bound volumes or scanned versions of the English-language portions – to please get in touch.

Steven Aftergood of the Project on Government Secrecy (part of the Federation of American Scientists) gave an excellent introduction to these publications in 1997:

Many people will recall that when Iranian revolutionaries seized the U.S. embassy in Teheran in 1979, they acquired a large cache of classified U.S. government documents, some of which had been shredded and painstakingly reassembled, which they proceeded to publish. What no one seems to have noticed, however, is that they never stopped publishing!

By 1995, an amazing 77 volumes of “Documents from the U.S. Espionage Den” (Asnad-i lanih-‘i Jasusi) had been collected and published by the “Muslim Students Following the Line of the Imam” (Center for the Publication of the U.S. Espionage Den’s Documents, P.O. Box 15815-3489, Teheran, Islamic Republic of Iran, tel. 824005). Each volume contains original documents along with Farsi translations and, for no extra charge, an inflammatory introductory essay. [Read the full article here]

In a frequently referenced 1987 article on the subject, Edward Jay Epstein wrote:

Iranian students seized an entire archive of CIA and State Department documents, which represented one of the most extensive losses of secret data in the history of any modern intelligence service. Even though many of these documents were shredded into thin strips before the Embassy, and CIA base, was surrendered, the Iranians managed to piece them back together. They were then published in 1982 in 54 volumes under the title “Documents From the U.S. Espionage Den”, and are sold in the United States for $246.50. As the Teheran Embassy evidently served as a regional base for the CIA, The scope of this captures intelligence goes well beyond intelligence reports on Iran alone. They cover the Soviet Union, Turkey, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Iraq. There are also secret analysis of arcane subjects ranging from the effectiveness of Israeli intelligence to Soviet oil production. [Read the full article here]

It turns out that in keeping with the times, the majority of the “Espionage Den” volumes have been scanned and are available on CDs sold in Iran. A Memory Hole reader had an Iranian friend buy the two-volume set, which he kindly gave to us. The major down side is that while the CDs contain 68 volumes of “Espionage Den” in Farsi (totalling over 10,000 pages), they contain only two PDF files of the original English-language documents (totalling a meager 400 pages). Adding to the frustration, the English material is presented in completely random order. Each page is usually from a completely different document than the page before and after it. We’re posting them as they appear on the CD (although broken down into five files instead of two, since the original files were so huge). If some enterprising reader wants to create an index, we’ll happily post it here.

Most of these documents are labeled “Confidential” or “Secret” and remain classified to this day.

Acrobat/PDF files

Part One (88 pages | 7.7 meg)

Part Two (88 pages | 7.8 meg)

Part Three (84 pages | 8.6 meg)

Part Four (70 pages | 7 meg)

Part Five (70 pages | 6 meg)

[…]

http://www.thememoryhole.org/espionage_den/

I remember watching a documentary about the amazing students who put together the millions of shredds of documents left behind when the ameicans were routed. They sat on the floor, carefully sifting through the strips of paper. As it says above, the completed reconstructions were published in books. Now you can understand a little bit more why Iranians call america The Great Satan. If you had read of the dastardly deeds done to them and their country, you would be as full of disdain as they are.

I have always wanted a copy of the documents they managed to reconstruct; its a pity that todays rock lusting ‘give us hamburgers’ Iranian students don’t have the zeal and common sense that their predecessors did – can you imagine the job they could be doing with the internet to show the world just what the hell is being done to them yet again?

Check it out:

http://www.thememoryhole.org/espionage_den/photos.htm

Golf ball dishes, Radios (and presumably crypto tools), Teletypes, periodic antennae – they really hit the motherlode!

UPDATE 2013

The venerable Memory Hole has been offline for years. Luckily, we made a copy of these fascinating documents, assembled them into a single 400 page PDF and stored them on Scribd where you can download them into your e-reader for perusal at your leisure. At the time of this update, they have been downloaded or read over eleven and a half thousand times.